• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Endoscopic Stapes Surgery Is a Valid Alternative to the Microscope

by Linda Kossoff • August 17, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Do intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery show evidence that the former is a better alternative than the latter?

Bottom Line: Endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery have similar audiological success, but some data suggest lower chorda tympani injury and postoperative taste disturbance risk with the endoscope.

You Might Also Like

  • Audiologic and Surgical Outcomes in Endoscopic Revision Stapes Surgery
  • Bone Cement Superiority in Ossicular Chain Reconstruction/ Revision Stapes Surgery Not Supported by Evidence
  • Understanding Use of Image Guidance Technology in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
  • Nasal Lavage May Be a Valid Alternative to Swab Method in SARS-CoV-2 Detection
Explore This Issue
August 2020

Background: The microscope provides reliable outcomes in stapes surgery but is disadvantaged by the need for an unobstructed view of the operating area. The endoscope can more easily provide a close-up view during surgery but has other drawbacks. No meta-analysis of evidence has compared outcomes of the two modalities.

Study Design: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis using multiple databases.

Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.

Synopsis: To test their hypothesis that endoscopy performs better than microscopy in stapes surgery, researchers reviewed literature from multiple databases, from inception to June 6, 2018, from studies that compared the modalities. Six of 3,017 articles were eligible for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. All were nonrandomized cohort studies, with the exposure group being patients who underwent fully endoscopic stapes surgery and the control group being patients who underwent microscopic stapes surgery. The primary outcomes considered were postoperative airborne gap and chorda tympani nerve injury; secondary outcomes were average operating time, tympanic membrane perforation, and postoperative taste disturbance, pain, and dizziness. The most statistically significant difference was chorda tympani nerve injury, which was shown to be more than three times likely to happen with microscopic stapes surgery than with the endoscope. Limitations included an uncertain risk of bias in some studies that reduced the level of evidence, and the inclusion of only articles that directly compared the two surgeries, which limited the data pool.

Citation: Koukkoullis A, Tóth I, Gede N, et al. Endoscope versus microscopic stapes surgery outcomes: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Laryngoscope. 130;8:2019-2027.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: clinical outcomes, treatmentIssue: August 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Audiologic and Surgical Outcomes in Endoscopic Revision Stapes Surgery
  • Bone Cement Superiority in Ossicular Chain Reconstruction/ Revision Stapes Surgery Not Supported by Evidence
  • Understanding Use of Image Guidance Technology in Endoscopic Sinus Surgery
  • Nasal Lavage May Be a Valid Alternative to Swab Method in SARS-CoV-2 Detection

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939