• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Ethically Managing Your Patients’ Digital Health Information

by G. Richard Holt, MD, MSE, MPH, MABE, D BE • April 12, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Discussion

While this scenario represents a constellation of private health information concerns, it serves to highlight issues that are being discussed currently in the United States. Since the passage of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996 and, more recently, the 2009 national digital medical records mandate and the CMS 2014 mandate, the healthcare enterprise has transitioned nearly completely to electronic management of health data. This transition from traditional paper documentation in both hospitals/clinics and physician offices has been difficult, expensive, and often burdensome.

You Might Also Like

  • Avoid Data Breaches, HIPAA Violations When Posting Patients’ Health Information Online
  • Rise of Personal Health Records Stresses Need for Access to Complete Patient Information
  • Why HIPAA, Protected Health Information Cybersecurity Best Practices Are Critical in COVID-19 Era
  • How to Say No to Patients, Ethically
Explore This Issue
April 2016
everything possible/shutterstock.com

everything possible/shutterstock.com

The early stages of EHR implementation, which require expert assistance, come with a steep learning curve and frequent problems. While these technical issues, along with noteworthy legal implications, have received significant attention, the ethical issues associated with electronic records are now being appreciated as equally important.

We are seeing increased activity in national and international hacking of data, and although this is primarily a financial issue, hackers also pose a real and present danger to hospital and physician databanks, perhaps aiming to exploit private health insurance or to hold hostage the PHI caretakers for ransom. Some patients are fearful that their PHI may potentially become compromised, with no capability on their part to ensure its safety. This understandably might lead to some patients expressing significant concerns about their PHI and requesting that their information be removed from an electronic system they perceive as insecure. The expansion of health information exchanges (HIEs) may also cause patients to worry about the risk that their personal data may be inappropriately exposed. Looking at it from the patient’s perspective, these concerns may be little different than our own concerns about breaches to our financial information and other important personal data sources. Indeed, hospitals, clinics, and physician practices cannot guarantee the unassailable integrity of their EHR systems.

Patient Rights

Regarding the patient’s request for medical records, the HIPAA Privacy Rule gives the patient the right of access to copies of their medical records but not the originals, which remain in the possession of the institution or provider. The patient can request the documents in a favored format, but if the physician feels the format—such as a USB drive—constitutes a risk to the security of the information, other formats may be provided. This applies to both electronic and paper medical records. The physician must provide the records to the patient within 30 days of the written request, unless the patient is notified of a request for a 30-day extension for extenuating circumstances.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Home Slider Tagged With: EHR, electronic health records, Ethics, health IT, otolaryngologyIssue: April 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Avoid Data Breaches, HIPAA Violations When Posting Patients’ Health Information Online
  • Rise of Personal Health Records Stresses Need for Access to Complete Patient Information
  • Why HIPAA, Protected Health Information Cybersecurity Best Practices Are Critical in COVID-19 Era
  • How to Say No to Patients, Ethically

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939