ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Ethically Managing Your Patients’ Digital Health Information

by G. Richard Holt, MD, MSE, MPH, MABE, D BE • April 12, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

Under new administration guidelines, the physician is not allowed to require the patient to state a reason for the request, nor can the physician deny a request for medical records by a patient who has failed to pay his medical bills. The physician’s office may charge the patient a nominal or reasonable fee to cover the cost of the copying, but may not charge for staff time required to locate the records. A physician may not be required to provide a typed translation of handwritten notes, although egregious handwriting may prevent the patient from full access to his medical information. In such a situation, it would be appropriate for the physician to spend time with the patient reviewing these handwritten notes, giving adequate explanation to ensure the patient’s understanding of his health status as noted in the record.

You Might Also Like

  • Digital Dilemma: Physicians oppose EHR requirements
  • How to Say No to Patients, Ethically
  • Avoid Data Breaches, HIPAA Violations When Posting Patients’ Health Information Online
  • Rise of Personal Health Records Stresses Need for Access to Complete Patient Information
Explore This Issue
April 2016

For a variety of reasons, many patient medical records—whether they are electronic or handwritten—will contain incomplete information, omissions of fact, or outright mistakes. This can especially be a risk when a physician takes home 30-plus charts at night to make written or electronic entries. Who can remember the exact details on each patient? It is quite ethical for the physician to be receptive to a patient’s review of his medical records, whether periodic or in toto, to allow for amendments of the records or addenda to reports. (This author has been cared for by an orthopedic surgeon who dictated the entire patient encounter at the end of the consultation and then asked the author to make any needed corrections to his statements.) Time constraints in the office may be a major deterrent to the accurate documentation of the medical history and clinical examination, although the rigidity of some EHR programming may also be complicit.

While it is understandable that some patients might have concerns about other healthcare entities’ access to their PHI, including office staff, the amount of information requested in this scenario about the scope of access appears to fall outside of a “reasonable accommodation.”

The Physician’s Role

While it is understandable that some patients might have concerns about other healthcare entities’ access to their PHI, including office staff, the amount of information requested in this scenario about the scope of access appears to fall outside of a “reasonable accommodation.” However, this case does point out the importance of the physician’s keen oversight of those staff members who participate in the recording of a patient’s PHI, especially the background, capabilities, and trustworthiness of a scribe. The veracity of the information input by a scribe is not only important to the patient’s clinical care, but also to the legal integrity of the documents. The patient is entitled to know how much responsibility is given to a scribe as well as the level and extent of the physician’s oversight of the information the scribe inputs into the EHR. Failure to identify

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics, Home Slider Tagged With: EHR, electronic health records, Ethics, health IT, otolaryngologyIssue: April 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Digital Dilemma: Physicians oppose EHR requirements
  • How to Say No to Patients, Ethically
  • Avoid Data Breaches, HIPAA Violations When Posting Patients’ Health Information Online
  • Rise of Personal Health Records Stresses Need for Access to Complete Patient Information

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Podcasts Becoming More Popular Method of Education for Otolaryngologists
    • How to Embrace Optimism in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Tips on How to Approach Conversations with Patients about the COVID-19 Vaccine
    • Steps You Should Take to Protect Your Voice and Hearing During Telemedicine Sessions
    • Routine Postoperative Adjunct Treatments Unnecessary for Idiopathic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Polls

Have you spoken with your patients about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.