• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Evaluation and Management of Patients After Unsuccessful Sleep Apnea Surgery

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • November 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

SAN DIEGO-For patients who undergo surgery for obstructive sleep apnea, failure of surgery to achieve success presents a number of challenges to otolaryngologists. First and foremost is the challenge of correctly assessing the outcome of surgery followed by the need to choose additional therapy tailored to the particular needs of each patient.

You Might Also Like

  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Explore This Issue
November 2009

In a miniseminar titled What to Do After Unsuccessful Sleep Apnea Surgery?, experts took on this challenge and highlighted key issues for otolaryngologists who grapple with the often difficult task of caring for patients with persistent sleep apnea after surgery.

Evaluating Surgical Outcome

For Samuel A. Mickelson, MD, an otolaryngologist at the Atlanta Snoring and Sleep Disorders Institute, the easiest measure of success for patients treated for obstructive sleep apnea, similar to all diseases, is whether the patient feels better and the symptoms have been relieved.

Improving quality of life, however, is only half the story. Survival outcomes make up the other half. The real question is how we define success for longevity, he said, adding that there still is no test that will predict how long a person will live or, more important, who will die of sleep apnea.

Figure. Although not as effective as CPAP in managing sleep apnea, oral appliances such as these are better tolerated and therefore provide overall comparable effectiveness.

click for large version
Figure. Although not as effective as CPAP in managing sleep apnea, oral appliances such as these are better tolerated and therefore provide overall comparable effectiveness.

As such, even if the patient feels better after apnea surgery, evaluation of the success or failure of sleep apnea surgery requires a follow-up postoperative sleep study to measure respiratory disturbance index (RDI) and apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)-the best measures currently available to measure indices of mortality risk.

To increase the accuracy of these measurements to predict survival outcomes requires comparing postoperative measurements with preoperative measurements, emphasized Dr. Mickelson, who highlighted the problems with obtaining an accurate measurement given that the measurements vary from night to night depending on a number of factors, including sleep position and degree of REM and NREM sleep.

Comparing pre- and postoperative sleep study measurements can help identify whether the AHI or RDI actually goes up or down, given these variations, he said.

What these measures say about surgical outcomes, however, remains uncertain. There is no set criterion that adequately defines success or failure, said Edward M. Weaver, MD, MPH, Chief of Sleep Surgery and Associate Professor of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at University of Washington School of Medicine in Seattle, adding that success or failure depends on a number of factors, including the goals of the patient, baseline apnea severity, comorbidity, and whether or not alternative treatments are still available.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Practice Management, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: head and neck surgery, OSA, patient satisfaction, sleep apnea surgeryIssue: November 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939