• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Evaluation and Management of Patients After Unsuccessful Sleep Apnea Surgery

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • November 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The apnea-hypopnea index does not correlate well with many important clinical features of sleep apnea, he said. Thus, success for any particular patient should be judged based on multiple clinical parameters, including patient symptoms and sense of improvement, exam findings, and numerous parameters from sleep testing.

You Might Also Like

  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Explore This Issue
November 2009

Postoperative Treatment Options

Along with further surgical options, a common therapy recommended for patients who need ongoing treatment is continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). According to Ofer Jacobowitz, MD, PhD, of Hudson Valley Ear, Nose and Throat PC in Middletown, NY, there are insufficient data to predict which patients will accept and adhere to CPAP after surgery.

Although in his clinical practice, the majority of patients will retry CPAP after surgery, adherence to treatment, which is critical to effectiveness, remains mixed due to persistent problems with comfort and other side effects. This mixed result with CPAP adherence is borne out in the literature. Some data indicate improved adherence to CPAP after surgery, perhaps attributed to lower CPAP pressure requirements, said Dr. Jacobowitz, but the data remain insufficient.

Another unanswered question is whether the anatomic alterations after palatal surgery can compromise the effectiveness of CPAP after surgery. Although a few studies show a higher chance of leaks in some postsurgery patients using CPAP, Dr. Jacobowitz pointed out that an often referenced study by Mortimore and colleagues used maximal air pressure to test the efficacy of CPAP on awake patients while erect (Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996; 154:1759-62).

That may not mean much because we’re not interested in maximal pressure, but in the pressure that the individual needs, he said, adding this is not the maximal pressure. When optimal pressure is used instead of maximal pressure, the incidence of leaks is far less. For example, ones study found leaks in only two of 52 patients at optimal pressure after multilevel surgery (Laryngoscope 2009;119:193-6). In another study, leaks at optimal pressure were present in five of 31 patients but only in those who underwent aggressive uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) with more resection of tissue (Sleep Breath 2006;10:37-42). This suggests that leaks may be avoided by more conservative technique with less resection.

Edward M. Weaver, MD, MPHThe apnea-hypopnea index does not correlate well with many important clinical features of sleep apnea. Thus, success for any particular patient should be judged based on multiple clinical parameters, including patient symptoms and sense of improvement, exam findings, and numerous parameters from sleep testing.
-Edward M. Weaver, MD, MPH

One potential way to improve the efficacy of CPAP by increasing adherence is by decreasing nasal resistance through nasal surgery. One of the main issues with noncompliance is intolerance to high air pressure. Dr. Jacobowitz highlighted data from several studies that showed the efficacy of nasal surgery in reducing nasal resistance and subsequently lowering the amount of air pressure and increasing tolerance to CPAP.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Practice Management, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: head and neck surgery, OSA, patient satisfaction, sleep apnea surgeryIssue: November 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939