• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Evaluation and Management of Patients After Unsuccessful Sleep Apnea Surgery

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • November 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Although many treatments, including surgery and CPAP, currently already fall under the auspices of otolaryngology, fitting and managing patients with oral appliances typically is done by a dental specialist, as recommended by the revised 2006 American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM) guidelines, despite the fact that most dentists are not trained in sleep issues and are not familiar with more than one appliance.

You Might Also Like

  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Explore This Issue
November 2009

With sufficient training and education about oral appliances, however, otolaryngologists should be able to provide this treatment as well, according to Dr. Jacobowitz, and echoed by Drs. Mickelson and Huntley, who added that providers need to be aware of their potential dental side effects and how to deal with them.

Sleep apnea is a medical problem, with serious health consequences such as cardiovascular disease, emphasized Dr. Huntley. Otolaryngologists don’t have to relegate the need to take a larger role in the entire care of the sleep apnea patient. We know the medicine, we know the disease process, and we know the upper airway anatomy better than anyone else.

As this is management of a medical problem, Dr. Huntley also emphasized that treatment with oral appliances, similar to surgery and CPAP, is covered by insurance. Under the auspices of many dentists, he said, this is often not the case, because they might not bill insurance for these appliances. Instead, patients are required to pay out of pocket, sometimes up to $3000 to $5000. This is not right, said Dr. Huntley, noting that if otolaryngologists would provide these oral appliances, they would be billed to insurance, eliminating out-of-pocket expenses for the patient.

Contact the Editor

ENToday welcomes your feedback about our publication! Contact us at ENToday@lwwny.com

©2009 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Practice Management, Sleep Medicine Tagged With: head and neck surgery, OSA, patient satisfaction, sleep apnea surgeryIssue: November 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Adding Enhanced Measurements to Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Aids in Distinguishing Central from Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients
  • Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: One Size Doesn’t Fit All
  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Options
  • Gaps in the Knowledge Base Regarding Surgery for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939