• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Evidence-Based Preoperative Testing Protocols Save Time, Money

by Amy E. Hamaker • June 15, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Can a streamlined preoperative care and testing workflow be designed for the otolaryngology–head and neck surgical practice?

Bottom Line: Evidence-based preoperative assessment protocols that reduce unnecessary testing and extraneous cost without increased perioperative morbidity and mortality should be implemented into routine otolaryngology practice.

You Might Also Like

  • Awake Laryngology Procedures Save Time, Money
  • The Role of Pulmonary Function Testing Prior to Partial Laryngeal Surgery
  • Is Preoperative Computed Tomography Necessary for Primary Stapes Surgery?
  • New Review Offers Evidence-Based COVID-19 Information for Otolaryngologists
Explore This Issue
June 2020

Commentary: “This article presents an up-to-date literature review of preoperative assessment for otolaryngology patients and presents an algorithm for determination of pre-operative testing necessary per published evidence.” —Cristina Cabrera-Muffly, MD

Background: A window of opportunity exists between surgical scheduling and the operative date to prepare patients for elective surgery in hopes of identifying high-risk individuals with significant perioperative morbidity. Standard practice typically combines a history and physical examination with a broad routine testing battery, but this practice is inefficient, poorly standardized across institutions, and expensive.

Study design: Literature review.

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla.

Synopsis: Currently, the Surgical Risk Scale (SRS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk assessment instruments are the most applicable perioperative risk stratification systems. Healthy patients undergoing low-risk surgery (ASA grade 1-2) require little to no preoperative workup. Patients able to exert ≥4 METS (1 MET is the basal oxygen consumption of a typical 40-year-old, 70-kg male) have at least moderate functional capacity and are at low risk of perioperative cardiac complications. There are no broadly accepted preoperative pulmonary assessment guidelines, but in select cases smoking cessation up to or more than six weeks prior to elective surgery may be beneficial. Key prehabilitation screening tools are serum creatinine (preexisting chronic renal failure), hemoglobin/hematocrit (preoperative anemia), electrocardiography (significant systemic medical comorbidities), and pregnancy testing. There is no evidence to support additional assessments for routine preoperative evaluation. There are special otolaryngologic circumstances that deserve consideration. Hypothyroidism has an association with adverse wound healing and pharyngocutaneous fistula development. Perioperative hyperglycemia, malnutrition, and age-related decline in physiologic reserve, or frailty, increase the risk of adverse outcomes.

Citation: Nickel C, Segarra D, Padhya T, Mifsud M. The evidence-based preoperative assessment for the otolaryngologist. Laryngoscope. 2020;130:38–44.   

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: clinical best practices, clinical costsIssue: June 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Awake Laryngology Procedures Save Time, Money
  • The Role of Pulmonary Function Testing Prior to Partial Laryngeal Surgery
  • Is Preoperative Computed Tomography Necessary for Primary Stapes Surgery?
  • New Review Offers Evidence-Based COVID-19 Information for Otolaryngologists

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Where should ENT publications draw the line on authors' use of generative AI?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Rhinology’s Persistent Gender Gap
  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • ENTs Urged to Look Beyond Refractory Sinus Disease for Underlying Immune Deficiency
    • When a “Blocked Ear” Isn’t Obstructive ETD
    • What Does It Mean to Be Written by a Human?
    • Reevaluating the CMS 90-Day CPAP Adherence Requirement: Persistent Use Among Early Nonadherent Patients
    • Vocal Outcomes After COVR in Porcine Bilateral Vocal Fold Resection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939