• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Exploring the Ethical Dimensions of Cross-cultural Patient Care

by G. Richard Holt, MD, MSE, MPH, MABE, D Bioethics • July 15, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Discussion

As America’s population becomes increasingly diverse, otolaryngologists are caring for patients with a wide range of cultural, language, and religious backgrounds. Some patients are immigrants, migrants, or undocumented residents, and some of these are older and have multiple co-morbidities. In the context of caring for these patients, we’re ethically obligated to better understand how their personal beliefs, developed through their own cultures, may affect their illnesses and interactions with healthcare providers. Although attaining cultural competence is often encouraged, it may be more practical to begin with seeking cultural awareness and appreciation to the extent that a meaningful patient-physician relationship and shared decision-making become possible.

You Might Also Like

  • How to Handle an Otolaryngology Patient Who Declines Treatment
  • Banning Unvaccinated Patients? Ethical Responsibilities Within the Context of COVID-19 Vaccination Controversies
  • Why Health Literacy Is Essential to Patient Care
  • Unprofessional Physician Behavior Raises Discipline Dilemma, Patient Care Concerns
Explore This Issue
July 2020

It cannot be expected that otolaryngologists will be able to learn all of the nuances and particulars of the various cultures that they might see in an individual practice. It would also be difficult, if not impossible, to fully determine how a patient’s culture might play a role in medical decision-making and the interaction between the patient and physician.

Suffice it to say that it’s incumbent upon a contemporary otolaryngologist to develop a functional knowledge of cultural considerations in patient care, and perhaps a more detailed knowledge base for those cultures most likely to visit his or her practice. There are ethical issues that must be considered when caring for patients who are of a different culture than the otolaryngologist, primarily based on our reliance on the four ethical principles of medical care—autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and social justice.

Navigating Cultural Differences

The foundation for ethical care in Western medicine is the development of a patient-physician relationship that’s built on honesty, concern, and meaningful communication, leading to the capacity for shared decision-making. Honesty and concern are the otolaryngologist’s responsibility, while communication requires a joint capability for information exchange and understanding. Meaningful communication can be challenging with language barriers and diverse cultural experiences; these test a physician’s verbal and nonverbal skills. In order to make the best diagnostic and therapeutic decisions for and with a patient, sufficient information must be exchanged to facilitate the understanding of goals, risks, benefits, and alternatives. When the otolaryngologist doesn’t speak or understand the language of the patient, miscommunication and misinterpretations can occur.

Although attaining cultural competence is often encouraged, ​it may be more practical to begin with seeking cultural awareness and appreciation to the extent that a meaningful patient-physician relationship and shared
decision-making become possible.

As the clinical scenario indicates, using an interpretation service, even a video one, isn’t a perfect means of communication. Interpretation may prolong the patient interaction time (or may cut it short if visit time is limited), may result in inaccurate or incomplete representation of the otolaryngologist’s or the patient’s meaning, or both, and may be complicated if the patient has difficulty with the translator’s syntax or dialect. But some form of interpretation is necessary.

Co-opting the help of a bilingual family member may be an option to consider, particularly when the patient requests it, but to be HIPAA compliant, that individual must be approved by the patient, and the otolaryngologist must be cautious about asking sensitive personal questions, while understanding the risk that the family member may put their own bias into the interpretation. Certified translators remain the safest option for the patient, but the otolaryngologist must be vigilant about the risks. Interpretation must reflect the exact information to be conveyed, without changes to the meaning; accuracy and completeness are of utmost importance.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Everyday Ethics Tagged With: Ethics, patient careIssue: July 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • How to Handle an Otolaryngology Patient Who Declines Treatment
  • Banning Unvaccinated Patients? Ethical Responsibilities Within the Context of COVID-19 Vaccination Controversies
  • Why Health Literacy Is Essential to Patient Care
  • Unprofessional Physician Behavior Raises Discipline Dilemma, Patient Care Concerns

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939