• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Frozen Section Margins Highly Accurate in Predicting Final Margin Status in HN Cancer

by Amy E. Hamaker • August 9, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

How reliable are frozen sections in predicting the ultimate final margin status for head and neck (HN) squamous cell carcinomas?

Bottom line: Individual frozen section reads are highly accurate, but negative intraoperative margins do not guarantee margin-negative resections.

You Might Also Like

  • Moderate Discrepancy Between Frozen Section and Permanent Section Analysis of Squamous Cell Carcinomas Margins
  • Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improve Incrementally with Surgical Margin Category
  • How To: Enhanced Intraoperative Communication of Tumor Margins Using 3D Scanning and Mapping
  • High-Resolution Microendoscopy Shows Promise for Intraoperative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Detection
Explore This Issue
August 2016

Background: Intraoperative frozen section assessment of surgical margins for HN squamous cell carcinomas is widely used, but surgeons, institutions, and pathologists use widely varying practices in how they sample tissue and process specimens. There is currently no consensus on how best to examine margins to maximize the utility of frozen sections.

Study design: Retrospective chart review of pathology reports from 437 surgical resections between 2010 and 2013.

Setting: Montefiore Medical Center Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, New York City.

Synopsis: Overall, frozen section margins had a sensitivity of 83.1% and a specificity of 97.9% for detecting positive final read, with an accuracy of 96.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 77.9%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 98.5%. When close margins were grouped with positive margins, sensitivity decreased to 77.5%; specificity and accuracy remained high at 97.2% and 92.8%, respectively; PPV increased to 88.7%; and NPV decreased to 93.8%. Most discrepancies resulted from additional sections evaluated during permanent processing; only three reads were revised based on later examination of the original frozen slides. When overall margin status as assessed by intraoperative frozen reads was compared to final margin status, 34% had only negative margins reported throughout, while 22.9% had one or more positive or close margins on frozen read but a negative final overall margin. When close margins were grouped with negative margins, 73.5% had no positive margin intraoperatively or on final report; 11.1% had a positive margin intraoperatively that was ultimately cleared through additional margins. Limitations include the study’s retrospective nature, variations in handling of both frozen and permanent samples, and patient heterogeneity.

Citation: Du E, Ow TJ, Lo YT, et al. Refining the utility and role of frozen section in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma resection. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:1768-1775.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, head and neck cancer, HN squamous cell carcinomas, surgical marginsIssue: August 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Moderate Discrepancy Between Frozen Section and Permanent Section Analysis of Squamous Cell Carcinomas Margins
  • Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Improve Incrementally with Surgical Margin Category
  • How To: Enhanced Intraoperative Communication of Tumor Margins Using 3D Scanning and Mapping
  • High-Resolution Microendoscopy Shows Promise for Intraoperative Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Margin Detection

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939