• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Getting out of the Insurance Game

by Rabiya S. Tuma, PhD • June 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Transitioning to a cash-only practice can increase your income-and your career satisfaction

You Might Also Like

  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • A New Game Plan: Otolaryngologists and consultants devise solutions to ride out the recession
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • A Look at National Health Spending
Explore This Issue
June 2006

As insurance reimbursements decline and the administrative tasks associated with third-party payment increase, some physicians choose to move to a cash-only office, where patients pay at the time of service. Two physicians who treat otolaryngology conditions shared their experiences with this approach with ENToday.

A Slow Shift in Louisiana

Gerard J. Gianoli, MD, an otolaryngologist-head and neck surgeon and an ENToday board member, worked at Tulane University School of Medicine until 2000 when he joined a two-doctor private practice in Baton Rouge, La. After he made that transition, he and his partner looked over the whole financial picture. They evaluated which insurance companies provided the lowest reimbursement and the highest grief factor, said Dr. Gianoli. And then we just started cutting them out.

In November 2005, they ended their last insurance contract; it had also been one of their largest contracts. The decision was driven by several factors. First, the insurance company had started to become more difficult to deal with and started to deny claims for services or procedures that they had routinely paid for in the past. Second, in the aftermath of Katrina, health insurance companies were not allowed to drop individuals because of unpaid premiums, but the companies were only liable for 50% of what they would normally have paid for their services-and the prompt payment law was suspended in Louisiana. That meant, said Dr. Gianoli, that instead of recovering 50 cents on the dollar and being paid within 30 days, they would get 25 cents on the dollar and have to wait as much as six months. They decided it wasn’t worth it and canceled the last contract.

Anyone can (move to a cash-only system)-it’s just a matter of whether they want to do it. Laying it on the line and saying, this is how much my services are worth, is a little scary. – Gerard J. Gianoli, MD

At that point, the office was already at about 60% cash-only basis. We haven’t noticed a monetary difference, probably because the change was so slow, he said. In fact, after the team opted out of Medicare a couple of years ago, their income increased because those appointment slots were filled with patients-Medicare or other-who were willing to pay for services.

Transparency with Patients

The office tells patients up front what their charge will be. If it is not clear beforehand what a patient will require, the office provides a range so that there are no surprises. The patients pay at the time of service and are given their Medicare or Medicaid forms so that they can apply for their own benefits. The interesting thing with that is that the patients are getting reimbursed at a higher rate than we were getting, said Dr. Gianoli.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy, Practice Management Tagged With: cost, healthcare reform, insurance, Medicare, patient communication, policy, practice management, reimbursementsIssue: June 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • The Opt-Outs: Otolaryngologists extol the benefits of third-party independence
  • A New Game Plan: Otolaryngologists and consultants devise solutions to ride out the recession
  • When Dealing with Insurers, Electronic Payment Tools May be an Otolaryngologist’s Best Friend
  • A Look at National Health Spending

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939