• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Head and Neck Cancer Patients Face Multiple Quality-of-Life Issues

by Gretchen Henkel • January 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Swallowing Interventions

Mike Yao, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Clinicians Question Usefulness of Multiple Post-Treatment PET/CT Scans for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Qualitative Research Shows How Patients Feel About Quality-of-Life Issues
  • Skin Cancer Index and Quality of Life
  • Nutrition Is Vital for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
January 2007
Mike Yao, MD

At the University of Pennsylvania Center for Voice and Swallowing, pretreatment counseling sessions with a speech-language pathologist introduce patients to potential side effects of chemoradiation-increasingly the treatment of choice over surgery for these cancers. According to Patricia K. Dooley, MS, CCC, SLP, Interim Director of the Speech-Language Pathology Department, these pretreatment counseling sessions provide an overview of the causes of dysphagia associated with these treatments, as well as the potential signs and symptoms of dysphagia. Patients are also presented with a range of oropharyngeal exercises, which target the tongue, lips, palate, and larynx and are designed to preserve swallowing function. The exercises, explained Dr. Mirza, can diminish the changes of severe fibrosis setting in due to radiation. The object is to help the patient continue to use muscles in the pharynx, thus preventing atrophy, even if he or she is using a feeding tube. With each passing day that they are not using those muscles, it gets less and less likely that they will ever use those muscles again, she noted.

The speech-language pathologists also re-evaluate their patients midway through treatment, when potential side effects of radiation begin to occur. Mucositis, xerostomia, trismus, and edema of the swallowing structures can start to affect patients’ swallowing. During this evaluation, patients will be trained in specific postural and swallowing maneuvers, and given food texture recommendations. The goal is to keep patients swallowing safely throughout the course of their treatment. Even if use of a tube becomes necessary for nutritional purposes, patients are encouraged to continue with their exercises. Our ultimate goal, said Ms. Dooley, is to have these patients resume a functional, oral diet.

Combating Isolation, Depression

Natasha Mirza, MD

Natasha Mirza, MD

Even if they are cancer-free after treatment, patients with oral, head and neck cancer fall into significant isolation that comes from not being able to eat by mouth, said Dr. Mirza, because all social activities in almost every society are based around eating. When an individual cannot eat, there is no reason to sit at the table or to sit with your friends or family. That leads to tremendous isolation and depression, and we know that depression can lead to increased morbidity, and poorer outcomes. (See sidebar.)

Helping the Patient

Referring ENTs can help ease the planning, treatment, and follow-up process by attending to a few important details, said Dr. Yao. For instance, he appreciates personal telephone communication from the referring physician. Otolaryngologists in the community can reinforce that patients traveling to a larger cancer center should be certain to obtain complete records. It’s very helpful to have all the actual X-rays, the actual pathology slides, and not just the readings from those, he said. Following treatment, the referring physician can help patients who prefer not to travel back to the cancer center for follow-ups. Typical follow-up intervals are every four to six weeks for the first year, every two months for the second year, and every three months for the third year. That’s a lot of driving, he noted, especially for someone who’s just been through chemotherapy and radiation.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: January 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Clinicians Question Usefulness of Multiple Post-Treatment PET/CT Scans for Head and Neck Cancer
  • Qualitative Research Shows How Patients Feel About Quality-of-Life Issues
  • Skin Cancer Index and Quality of Life
  • Nutrition Is Vital for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939