• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Higher Prevalence of Hearing Loss Among Cancer Survivors

by Linda Kossoff • January 5, 2024

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

CLINICAL QUESTION

What is the prevalence of subjective and objective hearing loss (HL) in cancer survivors as compared to that of the general population?

You Might Also Like

  • Hearing Impairment in Pediatric Population Associated with Higher Prevalence of Loneliness
  • Hearing Loss Less Prevalent among African-Americans
  • Hearing Loss Associated with Higher Incidence of Dementia
  • Obese Children Face Higher Risk of SNHL
Explore This Issue
December 2023

BOTTOM LINE

Findings suggest that cancer survivors have a significantly higher prevalence of both audiometry-confirmed and self-reported HL than the general population.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors are at greater risk of developing HL due to older age, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Although the number of U.S. cancer survivors has increased substantially in recent years, the prevalence of HL among them remains unknown. Moreover, uniform HL screening guidelines for this population are lacking.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers randomly selected 9,337 adults who underwent audiometry testing and responded to a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey hearing questionnaire during periods from 2011 to 2020 (prepandemic). They analyzed audiometry results and responses to two subjective survey questions related to troublesome hearing and tinnitus. Objective HL was defined by pure-tone averages greater than 20 dB HL. Of the 9,337 participants who completed both tests, 848 (55.6% women, mean age 62.7 years) were cancer survivors. Audiometry-confirmed results showed that cancer survivors had 43% higher odds of having speech-frequency HL and high-frequency HL than the general population. Subjective measures showed that cancer survivors had 43% increased odds of reporting troublesome hearing and of tinnitus than the general population. The discovered sensitivity of the single question method in detecting both types of HL in cancer survivors compared to the general population suggests this method’s potential in HL detection. Study limitations included the possibility that participants with severe HL and tinnitus were not selected for the survey.

CITATION: Wang Q, Jiang C, Wen C, et al. Subjective and objective hearing loss among US adult cancer survivors. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Published online October 5, 2023.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer survivors, hearling lossIssue: December 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • Hearing Impairment in Pediatric Population Associated with Higher Prevalence of Loneliness
  • Hearing Loss Less Prevalent among African-Americans
  • Hearing Loss Associated with Higher Incidence of Dementia
  • Obese Children Face Higher Risk of SNHL

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939