• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Current Peer-To-Peer Sessions Profoundly Impact Patient Care and Physician Wellbeing

by Robin W. Lindsay, MD • February 15, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

I spent the first 12 years of my career in the Navy, where surgeons saw patients, determined what was medically needed, and then added the patient to the next available surgical date. My transition to civilian healthcare had a steep learning curve. I vividly remember my first peer-to-peer. I was home for the holidays waiting for the scheduled call that never came. After more time on the phone rescheduling, the call finally came 30 minutes late as my entire family waited for me to start dinner. I felt that I needed to do this for my patient. Eventually, my practice hired a wonderful PA to cover peer-to-peers. Recently, however, while she was on maternity leave, I took back the responsibility. Many years later, I still find the process burdensome, and my frustration has increased. It’s not only an inconvenience, but increases the cost of delivering care, decreases access, and profoundly impacts physician wellbeing.

You Might Also Like

  • How Surgical Ergonomics Impact Surgeon Wellbeing, Outcomes, and Careers
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • How Electronic Health Records Impact Physician–Patient Relationship
Explore This Issue
February 2023

Think about the cost of the hours spent by clinical and administrative staff gathering and submitting documents to insurance, waiting to hear back, appealing the initial denial, and then scheduling the peer-to-peer. Some insurers just deny without even the opportunity for a peer-to-peer.

Think about the patient who has taken time off work, has family come into town, is preparing to have surgery, and is waiting by the phone days before surgery to find out if they can receive care.   

Think about operating room personnel and use. The room is staffed and ready to provide care, only to sit empty when surgery is cancelled a few days prior. 

Think about the patient who could have been scheduled for surgery and instead had to wait longer for care.  

Think about the surgeon, who has spent at least a decade in training and frequently cares for very specific disorders hundreds of times a year, speaking to a provider who has never seen the patient and whose job is to question their clinical judgement. The process is demoralizing and disempowering. Even when speaking to polite and knowledgeable providers during peer-to-peers, I can’t help but to feel like I’m on trial for fraud and having to defend my integrity so that my patients can have the needed procedure. What about our oath to do no harm? It attacks a core physician tenet—to care for the patient. Even when approval is obtained, the feeling of victory is short lived as it’s no guarantee that the insurance company will pay for the surgery after it’s performed.  

Fraud exists in healthcare and should be stopped, but those providing consistent, high-quality care should be innocent until proven guilty. Physicians should advocate for “Gold card” laws such as the one pioneered in Texas, where surgeons with high insurance approval rates or documented outcome improvement receive expedited approval. This can reduce costs, increase patient access, and allow physicians to regain a sense of autonomy. Decreasing the burden on practicing surgeons can allow them to focus on why they became surgeons: to care for patients.    

—Robin

Filed Under: Home Slider, Letter From the Editor Tagged With: peer relationships, Practice FocusIssue: February 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • How Surgical Ergonomics Impact Surgeon Wellbeing, Outcomes, and Careers
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • Do Prior Authorization Requests Hurt Patient Care?
  • How Electronic Health Records Impact Physician–Patient Relationship

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939