• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How Medical Manufacturers Are Pivoting During the Coronavirus Pandemic

by Thomas R. Collins • June 15, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Development Challenges

At KCK Group, Inc., a Trabuco Canyon, Calif., venture capital firm that invests in a variety of areas including medical technology companies on the verge or at the start of commercialization, the fate of projects hangs in the balance, although no projects have had to be abandoned so far, said Susan Stimson, executive in residence at KCK, who works in the medical technologies division.

You Might Also Like

  • How the Coronavirus Pandemic May Change Medical Societies and Their Gatherings
  • What Steps ENT Private Practices Are Taking to Financially Survive the Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Here are Best Practices to Help Ensure Safety in Pediatric Otolaryngology During the Coronavirus Pandemic
  • In the Midst of the Coronavirus Pandemic, Now Is the Time to Ramp Up Telemedicine
Explore This Issue
June 2020

“One of the actions the team has taken is to spend time with those CEOs to really understand how we can help,” she said. “What are their needs? How can we help them scenario-plan to evaluate many of the potential ways in which this pandemic could impact them? The reality is, no one knows exactly what to expect.”

The hold on elective procedures has affected the development of some of the medical devices in projects supported by KCK, Stimson said. In some cases, clinical study enrollment has been halted. But many studies had already been fully enrolled, and those patients need follow-up. Much of that is being done remotely through telephone or video conferencing.

“It’s ethically responsible to find a way to follow up with those patients, particularly when you’re talking about investigational devices, and especially if those devices are pre-FDA approval,” said Stimson. “You need to be able to continue to collect that data.”

If more contact is necessary, decisions have to be made about whether those visits are carried out. Medical device companies have had to call clinical sites to find out what they and their patients are comfortable with, and consider the type of procedure that’s involved, Stimson said. “I’ve heard some physicians talk about if a patient had to wait, say, two months, do they believe that patient’s outcome would change? If not, can we hold off for a while?” she noted.

At some centers, particularly academic medical centers, clinical research staff have been shifted away from existing studies to studies involving COVID-19, she said. For the most part, however, said Stimson, “I think people are looking at this as a pause—one of unknown duration, of course,” and are now thinking about a plan for the right timing and pace to resume activity once hospitals and offices start seeing patients regularly again.

While most companies are experiencing a slowdown, one company associated with KCK, Lungpacer Medical, Inc., has the opposite problem: It has been granted emergency FDA approval for its technology, which had been in Phase 3 trials, that helps wean patients off ventilators more quickly by stimulating the phrenic nerve and keeping the diaphragm active and well-conditioned. Wider deployment of the technology is happening now rather than later, requiring planning for the sudden training of healthcare workers on how to use the system that will have to be done remotely on computer tablets rather than in person.

The Lungpacer situation illustrates the unpredictability that has been wrought by the pandemic, Stimson said. “It isn’t uncommon for start-up medical companies to, at some point, face a curveball and need to come up with plans B and C, because that’s just the nature of the business,” she said. “It is certainly unusual for all of them to face a curveball at the same time and related to the same issue.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: coronavirus, COVID19Issue: June 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • How the Coronavirus Pandemic May Change Medical Societies and Their Gatherings
  • What Steps ENT Private Practices Are Taking to Financially Survive the Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Here are Best Practices to Help Ensure Safety in Pediatric Otolaryngology During the Coronavirus Pandemic
  • In the Midst of the Coronavirus Pandemic, Now Is the Time to Ramp Up Telemedicine

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939