• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How This Healthcare Team Maintained a Head and Neck Cancer Surgical Practice During COVID-19

by Faisal Ahmad, MD, April D. Starling, DNP, RN, Palma D. Iacovitti, DNP, MBA, RN, and Russell B. Smith, MD • November 17, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

© WWW.SCIENCEPHOTO.COM / SHUTTERSTOCK.COM

As the battle against COVID-19 continues, especially where we practice in Florida, it’s crucial that we continue to implement preventative safety measures in our practice. We wanted to share the lessons that the head and neck surgical oncology team at Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center in Jacksonville, Fla., learned last year as COVID-19 developed into a global pandemic.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Multidisciplinary Team Care for Head and Neck Cancer Worth It?
  • Head and Neck Cancer: What Can Be Done to Mitigate Differences in Diagnosis Between Healthcare Providers?
  • Head Neck Cancer Associated with Significant Incremental Increases in Annual Healthcare Expenditures
  • Patients in Head and Neck Cancer Trials Don’t Reflect Clinical Practice
Explore This Issue
November 2021

Beginning in March 2020, we implemented a four-month retrospective study analyzing the effects of a series of precautions and practice changes on our ability to deliver high-volume patient care while mitigating virus spread to both patients and team members. We knew it was critical to continue treating head and neck cancer patients during the pandemic.

Here’s what we learned: During the study period, our three-surgeon team performed a total of 812 patient procedures, including 180 new cancer diagnoses. Two hundred seventy-seven in-clinic procedures were performed, and 141 patients required surgery. Admissions resulted in a cumulative length of stay of 462 patient days. Through the course of the study, none of the surgeons, advanced practice providers, or staff acquired COVID-19.

Only a single patient who was COVID-19 positive was taken to the operating room. This patient had advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma and developed spontaneous bleeding from his tonsil. He was diagnosed with COVID-19 upon admission to the emergency department, and the decision was made to proceed given his profuse bleeding refractory to conservative measures.

Patients were screened three times: over the phone a day prior to their visit, upon entry to the cancer center, and upon triage in the clinic.

With the pandemic persisting, special consideration must be given to the safe implementation and/or continuation of critical clinical activities, particularly as it relates to head and neck cancer care. Considering that the SARS-CoV-2 virus is noted to have an elevated presence in the upper airway, with highest levels in the sinonasal tract, aerosol-generating procedures pose an increased occupational risk.

Given our success, we would like to share our precautions in the hope that these measures will be especially beneficial for reducing risk to other otolaryngology practices, as routine practice includes high-risk activities, such as aerosol-generating procedures (endotracheal intubation, tracheotomy, flexible and rigid endoscopy) and use of energy devices during manipulation of high viral load tissues, including the mucosal surfaces of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Multi-Tiered Screening Protocol

The team determined the urgency of new patient referrals on a case-by-case basis, and elective referrals were delayed. Patients were screened three times: over the phone a day prior to their visit, upon entry to the cancer center, and upon triage in the clinic. Pre-visit screening allowed the clinic team to refer patients who were high risk or potentially infected to appropriate care and/or quarantining and testing. The screening questions were developed based on CDC guidance recommendations and were also used to screen asymptomatic virus carriers with queries regarding loss of taste and smell.

Patients were assessed again on the day of their visit upon entry to the cancer center. Screening included temperature checks and scripted questions pertaining to sick contacts and COVID-19-related symptoms, including dysgeusia and anosmia. Emphasis was placed on screening both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. These various screening events allowed for multiple points of patient education and intervention, while also reinforcing the importance of virus-related precautions.

Above and Beyond Standard Precautions

While face masks were permissible during socially distanced nonpatient work, N95 masks and eye protection were required for all team members for every patient visit and procedure done in the clinic. Further precautions included protective gowns, face shields, and in-room air scrubbers for higher-risk aerosol-generating procedures.

During procedures, only critical team members were permitted in the rooms; the senior-most team member performed the procedures to reduce time and risk of aerosol generation. Following each clinic procedure, the room was cleaned according to hospital infection control policies, including the use of disinfectant on surfaces and the use of an in-room air scrubber with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filter, which was an extra precaution on top of what was required.

Noncritical team members exited the operating room during intubation and extubation, as it was considered a major aerosol-generating procedure. The surgical team waited outside the operating room for six minutes to allow aerosolized particles to settle after intubation. All operating room team members wore N95 or equivalent respirators under standard surgical masks for surgeries that involved the upper aerodigestive tract.

Our team’s experience demonstrates that it’s possible to maintain a high-volume head and neck practice during the pandemic. These precautions reduce the risk of virus transmission and maintain the safety of patients and healthcare personnel.


Faisal Ahmad, MD, is a head and neck surgical oncologist; April D. Starling, DNP, RN, is a nurse manager; Palma D. Iacovitti, DNP, MBA, RN, is the program manager for surgical oncology clinics; and Russell B. Smith, MD, is the chief of the section of head and neck surgical oncology at Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Viewpoint Tagged With: COVID19Issue: November 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Multidisciplinary Team Care for Head and Neck Cancer Worth It?
  • Head and Neck Cancer: What Can Be Done to Mitigate Differences in Diagnosis Between Healthcare Providers?
  • Head Neck Cancer Associated with Significant Incremental Increases in Annual Healthcare Expenditures
  • Patients in Head and Neck Cancer Trials Don’t Reflect Clinical Practice

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939