• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

How To: Tunneled Submental Island Flap for Reconstruction of Endoscopic Nasopharyngectomy Defects

by ackson R. Vuncannon, MD, Alejandra Rodas, MD, Georges E. Daoud, MD, Roberto M. Soriano, MD, Azeem S. Kaka, MD, and C. Arturo Solares, MD • April 3, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

INTRODUCTION

Salvage nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a morbid procedure. Sequelae may include velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), skull base osteomyelitis, and internal carotid artery (ICA) blowout syndrome, which carries a 60% risk of mortality. Robust reconstruction of the surgical defect is imperative, especially if re-irradiation of the field is to be considered. Nasoseptal flaps (NSFs) are the workhorses for the reconstruction of skull base defects; however, they present several drawbacks for the reconstruction of nasopharyngeal defects. The NSF is thin, and the tissue from which it is harvested may have withstood radiation for the primary treatment of NPC.

You Might Also Like

  • Regional Flap vs. Free Flap Reconstruction: Point–Counterpoint
  • How To: Nasopharyngectomy without Maxillary Swing via a Combined Open Lateral and Endoscopic Approach
  • Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Indications Continue to Expand
  • How To: Dual-Vector Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Smile Reanimation with Lower Lip Depression
Explore This Issue
April 2025

The ideal reconstruction would offer healthy vascularized tissue with adequate bulk to limit VPI and provide protection to the cervical ICA. The submental artery island flap (SMIF) offers a sizeable musculocutaneous flap with a reliable vascular pedicle, preventing the need for microvascular anastomosis. Additionally, the flap lies largely outside of typical radiation fields used for NPC, as the lymphatic drainage of the nasopharynx essentially bypasses the Level 1 nodal station.

The SMIF is commonly used for the reconstruction of skin and mucosal defects. Dissection of the vascular pedicle to the artery and vein of origin allows reliable reach for lateral skull base defects. Similarly, this long, narrow pedicle allows the flap to reach the nasopharynx and central skull base when directed along a more medial vector through the parapharyngeal space. This study details the utilization of a pedicled SMIF for reconstruction after endoscopic nasopharyngectomy in a patient with recurrent NPC.

METHODS

A 58-year-old male presented with recurrent (rycT2N0M0) NPC two years after the completion of definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for his initial disease. MRI demonstrated recurrent tumor involving the right fossa of Rosenmüller, Eustachian tube, and parapharyngeal space with 180-degree contact of the parapharyngeal ICA (Fig. 1). There was no obvious perineural spread, intracranial extension, or extension to the prevertebral fascia. The patient underwent an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) for salvage nasopharyngectomy. Reconstruction of the nasopharyngeal defect was accomplished with a pedicled SMIF to provide appropriate tissue bulk in the infratemporal fossa (ITF) and guard the ICA. Approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) was requested, and this project was determined to be

IRB-exempt.

RESULTS

A Denker’s extended medial maxillectomy was performed on the right, along with a complete ethmoidectomy and posterior septectomy to create a common sphenoid cavity. A left NSF was harvested and tucked into the ipsilateral maxillary sinus. The contents of the pterygopalatine fossa (PPF) were mobilized inferolaterally, and the greater sphenoid wing (GSW) and pterygoid plates were drilled to expose the ITF. The lateral pterygoid muscle (LPM) was elevated from the GSW and resected, exposing the foramen ovale and foramen spinosum. The parapharyngeal ICA was identified, and the tumor was dissected off the vessel. Tumor dissection continued medially along the prevertebral fascia. A right neck dissection was performed for vascular control and nodal sampling.

Figure 1: (A) T1-weighted MRI with gadolinium and fat saturation in the axial plane: Enhancing nasopharyngeal lesion centered in the right fossa of Rosenmüller, with extension to the prevertebral fascia, parapharyngeal ICA, and pterygoid plates; (B) Coronal plane: Enhancing right nasopharyngeal lesion, with extension superiorly into the mandibular strut of the greater sphenoid wing and foramen ovale, and laterally into the ITF and parapharyngeal space. ICA, Internal carotid artery; ITF, Infratemporal fossa. doi.10.1002/lary.31931

An SMIF was then harvested for reconstruction in the manner described by Patel and colleagues. (Laryngoscope. doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000246519.77156.a4). The nasopharyngectomy defect was inspected and measured; a 4 × 6 cm skin paddle was designed in the submental skin. Subplatysmal flaps were previously raised in the neck dissection, and the marginal mandibular nerve was identified and mobilized superiorly. The submandibular gland was dissected from its fascial capsule and excised to allow identification of the facial and submental vessels (Fig. 2A). The anterior skin paddle incision was carried to the superficial layer of the deep cervical fascia. The integrity of the vascular pedicle was confirmed, and the skin paddle incision was completed. The flap was harvested from left to right (distal to proximal) by identifying and transecting the mylohyoid muscle in the midline and dividing the right anterior belly of the digastric muscle from the mandible and hyoid. The mylohyoid was then detached from the mandible and hyoid. The muscle was bluntly dissected from the middle layer of deep cervical fascia to mobilize the vascular pedicle (Fig. 2B). The facial artery and vein were ligated above the origin of the submental vessels, and the pedicle was dissected proximally to maximize its length (Fig. 2C). The parapharyngeal space had been exposed during tumor resection as the MPM was detached from its origin by drilling the pterygoid plates. Access to the parapharyngeal space in the neck was facilitated after dividing the mylohyoid muscle from the mandible during flap harvest. The tunnel for transposition of the SMIF to the nasopharynx was then created by simply releasing the stylomandibular ligament and dilating the parapharyngeal space through blunt dissection along the MPM (Fig. 2D).

Figure 2: Harvesting the SMIF: (A) meticulous excision of the submandibular gland to preserve the submental vessels; the common facial and external jugular veins are preserved; (B) the mylohyoid muscle is divided at the midline raphe and released from the mandible and the hyoid; the ipsilateral anterior digastric is included to preserve perforating arteries. The flap is then bluntly dissected away from the geniohyoid muscle and middle layer of deep cervical fascia; the mylohyoid is included in the flap; (C) the myocutaneous SMIF may include a sizeable skin paddle along with submental fat and the anterior belly of the digastric muscle and mylohyoid muscle; (D) retrograde dissection of the facial artery to its origin from the external carotid artery maximizes pedicle length. A tunnel is dissected through the parapharyngeal space medial to the mandibular insertion of the medial pterygoid muscle to allow transposition of the flap into the nasopharynx. Ant, Anterior; M, Muscle; Post, Posterior; SMIF, Submental island flap. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31931

The skin paddle was de-epithelialized and passed to the nasopharyngectomy defect through the parapharyngeal corridor along the surface of a one-inch Penrose drain. To pass the flap, a traction suture was placed on the distal end of the skin paddle. Under endoscopic visualization, the flap was pushed cranially through the parapharyngeal space while pulling on the traction suture until it was seated in the surgical defect. Flap inspection revealed bleeding from its de-epithelialized surface, confirming the integrity of the vascular pedicle. Manipulation of the flap demonstrated that no further measures were necessary to secure it within the defect. Flap stabilization was provided by the tethering effect of the vascular pedicle within the narrow transposition corridor. The previously harvested NSF was rotated to cover exposed bone in the clival recess. Absorbable nasal packing was placed anterior to the flap in the maxillary sinus, maintaining patency of the nasopharynx. A temporary tracheostomy was performed to ensure a safe airway in the immediate post-operative period.

The final pathology was consistent with squamous cell carcinoma, and margins were reported negative. The patient underwent an endoscopic biopsy of the superior ITF four months after the procedure due to an area with concerning residual disease. This biopsy required partial mobilization of the SMIF, which was well integrated and possessed a robust blood supply. No residual disease was identified in the biopsy, and the patient had no evidence of disease 12 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic nasopharyngectomy exemplifies both the technical progress in expanded endoscopic skull base surgery and its novel reconstructive challenges. The SMIF is well suited for reconstruction of nasopharyngectomy defects and may be useful more broadly for reconstruction of volumetric defects of the central skull base.   

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, How I Do It, Practice Focus Tagged With: nasopharyngeal carcinoma, NPC, velopharyngeal insufficiency, VPIIssue: April 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Regional Flap vs. Free Flap Reconstruction: Point–Counterpoint
  • How To: Nasopharyngectomy without Maxillary Swing via a Combined Open Lateral and Endoscopic Approach
  • Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery Indications Continue to Expand
  • How To: Dual-Vector Gracilis Muscle Transfer for Smile Reanimation with Lower Lip Depression

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • The Best Site for Pediatric TT Placement: OR or Office?

    • The Road Less Traveled—at Least by Otolaryngologists

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939