• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

IOM Report: Asbestos Can Cause Laryngeal Cancer

by Peggy Eastman • October 1, 2006

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Report Online The report is available online at national-academies.org

You Might Also Like

  • Sociodemographics Affect Treatment, Outcome of Advanced Laryngeal Cancer
  • Effects of Corticocosteroids and ß2-Agonists on Laryngeal Mucosa in a Rat Model
  • Changing Trends in Laryngeal Cancer and High-Volume Providers
  • HPV-Oropharyngeal Cancer Link May Affect Cancer Screening and Prognosis: The link offers potential for improved detection and prevention, but more research is needed
Explore This Issue
October 2006

WASHINGTON, DC-A committee of the Institute of Medicine (IOM) here has concluded that there is enough scientific evidence to state that exposure to asbestos causes cancer of the larynx. Asbestos-exposed smokers may be at even higher risk of laryngeal cancer because of the potential interaction between inhaled asbestos particles and smoking-triggered laryngeal irritation.

The IOM committee, chaired by Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS, Professor and Chairman of the Department of Epidemiology at Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health, found that there is suggestive but insufficient evidence that asbestos exposure causes cancers of the pharynx, stomach, colon, and rectum.

As for esophageal cancer and asbestos exposure, the committee, which included former American Medical Association President Lonnie R. Bristow, MD, concluded in its pre-publication report, Asbestos: Selected Cancers, that the scientific evidence is not sufficient to draw any conclusions. The term asbestos is applied to several mineral species when they occur in a fibrous form. Asbestos particles can do damage when they are inhaled.

The new IOM study was funded by a contract with the National Institutes of Health at the request of Senator Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), a senior member of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a champion of miners’ health and safety. His state, Pennsylvania, has a history of mining.

Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act

Senate Bill 852, the Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution (FAIR) Act, was the impetus behind the IOM committee’s charge of determining whether asbestos was causal in the five cancers studied.

If passed, this bill would establish an industry-funded $140 billion trust fund for monetary compensation of people suffering from the adverse health effects of working with asbestos or of living in Libby, Mont., a high-exposure town. Laryngeal cancer is relatively uncommon: there will be about 9500 new cases this year, according to the American Cancer Society (ACS). About 3740 people will die of laryngeal cancer this year, according to ACS data.

During the 20th century (especially during the years of World War II), asbestos was used in many products, including home insulation and roofing products, and people are still exposed despite a drop in production since the 1980s.

Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MSJonathan M. Samet, MD, MS, chaired the committee that wrote the report. The Institute of Medicine undertook the study to answer questions raised in congressional discussions about compensation for people with ailments associated with asbestos exposure. The study committee assessed the quality, limitations, and applicability of 120 epidemiological studies of asbestos exposure and cancers of the throat and digestive tract, as well as information from 200 experimental studies.

In 1973 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency banned the spraying of asbestos insulation in housing, and other restrictions later followed. Asbestos fibers are known to be carcinogenic. Asbestos has already been shown to be causally linked to lung cancer and mesothelioma, a rare tumor of the pleural and peritoneal mesothelium.

Asbestos has also been linked to asbestosis, which is characterized by fibrosis of the lung and reduced lung function. In the 1950s, epidemiologists documented the link between lung cancer and asbestos exposure, especially in exposed workers who smoked.

U.S. asbestos-using industries have included insulation plants; textile plants; friction products plants; paper, packing, and asphalt products plants; cement pipe plants; and cement shingle, millboard, and gasket plants.

Although exposures in occupational settings have been much higher than those in residential settings, the committee pointed out that some activities in the home-such as shaking out work clothes of an asbestos worker-can approach the exposure levels found in the workplace.

Highest Exposures

The highest exposures have been among workers employed in plants that manufacture asbestos products, or those employed by mining and milling companies. Population exposure can occur not only through inhalation, but also through the consumption of asbestos in drinking water, the IOM committee found.

Asbestos can enter the drinking water supply from erosion of natural deposits, mining operations, or asbestos-containing cement pipes. As the science base has increased, exposure limits considered acceptable for occupational exposure to asbestos have dropped over time, the report found.

In exploring the link between asbestos and other cancers, if any, the committee reviewed 120 epidemiological studies of asbestos exposure and cancers of the throat and digestive tract. It also examined the evidence from about 200 experimental studies.

The base of evidence linking asbestos exposure causally to laryngeal cancer included more case-control studies-18-than were available for other cancer sites reviewed by the committee. The number of cohort populations, 35, was similar to those for stomach or colorectal cancer.

Exposed individuals in the studies reviewed by the committee had come in contact with asbestos in many industries and in many geographical areas, including North America, South America, Europe, and Japan.

For laryngeal cancer, the IOM committee identified consistency of findings among the epidemiologic studies. Further, it found that asbestos exposure was associated with increased risk of laryngeal cancer in all the nine larger cohort studies and in meta-analyses of the cohort and case-control data.

Evidence of Dose-Response Relationship

There was also some evidence of a dose-response relationship in both the cohort and case-control studies of asbestos exposure and cancer of the larynx. It was the consistency of study findings that led the committee to conclude that the evidence is sufficient to infer a causal relationship between asbestos exposure and laryngeal cancer.

Asbestos fibers-as contrasted to other particulate matter in the air-are longer than they are wide. The IOM committee found that an asbestos mineral’s property, such as its particle size, shape, dissolution, and precipitation, can affect its potential relationship to pathogenesis, especially when it is breathed in.

In general, the smaller the particle, the farther it can travel in the human body before it is deposited-a function of gravity. Smaller particles are usually deposited in the lower airways, whereas larger particles are deposited higher in the respiratory tract, the committee found.

In contrast with studies of asbestos fiber deposits in the lower respiratory tract, there are few data on fiber deposition and clearance in the upper respiratory tract. Although data show that a fraction of inhaled fibers would be deposited in the larynx, those that are can be damaging, especially in smokers.

For example, available studies show that tobacco-smoking and other causes of chronic laryngeal irritation might interfere with the clearance of asbestos fibers from laryngeal mucosal surfaces.

Regarding the dose of inhaled asbestos fibers known to be harmful, the data are scant. The IOM committee reached the conclusion that the most relevant dose measure for cancer is probably the cumulative number of fibers that reach and persist in the target organ. The biologically effective dose is related to fibers that interact with target cells.

©2006 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Departments, Laryngology, Medical Education, Practice Focus Tagged With: asbestos, cancer, diagnosis, laryngeal cancer, researchIssue: October 2006

You Might Also Like:

  • Sociodemographics Affect Treatment, Outcome of Advanced Laryngeal Cancer
  • Effects of Corticocosteroids and ß2-Agonists on Laryngeal Mucosa in a Rat Model
  • Changing Trends in Laryngeal Cancer and High-Volume Providers
  • HPV-Oropharyngeal Cancer Link May Affect Cancer Screening and Prognosis: The link offers potential for improved detection and prevention, but more research is needed

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939