• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

IPAB is Medicare’s New Hammer for Spending Accountability

by Christopher Guadagnino, PhD • June 7, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

On Feb. 29, the Health Subcommittee of the House Energy and Commerce Committee held a meeting to consider H.R. 452 and voted 17 to 5 to favorably report the bill out of committee. The top-ranking Democrat on the subcommittee and one other Democrat voted for the measure, along with all 15 Republicans present.

You Might Also Like

  • A Look at National Health Spending
  • Medicare Physician Payment Cut Averted
  • Payment Limbo: Medical societies take on SGR reform
  • Medicare Battle Heats Up: Geographic Disparities spark look into spending variation
Explore This Issue
June 2012

Another supporter of H.R. 452, the American College of Surgeons, has long opposed the IPAB. David Hoyt, MD, FACS, ACS Executive Director, recently sent a letter supporting the repeal of the IPAB to the subcommittee’s chairman, warning that “leaving payment policy decisions in the hands of an unelected, unaccountable governmental body with minimal congressional oversight will negatively impact the availability of quality, efficient health care to Medicare beneficiaries and all Americans.”

The Real Cost Drivers

Besides urging repeal of the IPAB, the AAO-HNS also urges Congress to revisit the ACA to ensure that implementation efforts focus on reform provisions that genuinely improve quality and access to health care. According to Dr. Nielsen, the current economic situation is unsustainable and poses a looming crisis unless the rising cost of health care is addressed. Reform should drill down to the major locus of cost savings, which is not physician reimbursement, per se, he said.

“We have to accept responsibility to reduce costs on our own, and we know that reimbursement can no longer be entirely based on fee for service. But high quality, highly specialized tertiary care can only be sustained if it is reimbursed adequately,” Dr. Nielsen said.

If the whole purpose of mechanisms like the IPAB is to reduce the overall cost of health care, the most dramatic opportunities will not come from penalizing physicians who offer the most sophisticated, life-saving procedures, he said.

Instead, the focus should be on drivers of the highest disease and cost burdens, things such as end-of-life care, COPD and other chronic diseases, end-stage renal disease and preventable hospital readmissions, Dr. Nielsen said. “Successfully influencing these factors is where you dramatically shift costs,” he added.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: billing and coding, costs, healthcare reform, IPAB, Medicare, policyIssue: June 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • A Look at National Health Spending
  • Medicare Physician Payment Cut Averted
  • Payment Limbo: Medical societies take on SGR reform
  • Medicare Battle Heats Up: Geographic Disparities spark look into spending variation

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939