• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Is Fixation of Mandible Fractures Urgent?

by Daniel A. Barker, MD, and Stephen S. Park, MD • February 1, 2013

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Trio Best PracticeBackground

Mandible fractures have been studied extensively, but controversy remains over the urgency of repair. There are conflicting reports on this topic with some recommending immediate fixation, or at least within the first 72 hours, whereas others claim that repairs as late as five days post-injury do just as well. There are a number of considerations that influence timing of intervention, such as associated injuries, which can preclude aggressive surgical manipulation. However, there is a transition period when the sense of “urgency” becomes more germane.

You Might Also Like

  • The Importance of Timing in Mandible Fracture Repair
  • Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures Should Be Screened for Concussion
  • Erich Arch Bar Use Declines in Favor of Manual Reduction in Mandible Fracture Management
  • What Is the Evidence for Open Versus Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures In Adults?
Explore This Issue
February 2013

Should a closed reduction with mandibular-maxillary fixation (MMF) be promptly performed at the beside of the intensive care unit patient? Alternatively, can they be conveniently seen in the office and scheduled for elective surgery within a week or two? Intuitively, delayed repair can be associated with compromised nutrition, poor hygiene, inflammation, scarring within the fracture, and even contamination. On the other hand, facial swelling can also subside and facilitate exposure. Most importantly, however, is whether or not the final outcomes are impacted in terms of union and occlusion.

Best Practice

Delay in repair can be associated with technical challenges and complications. A more vigilant debridement, reduction, and fixation are all warranted. Delay up to five days after injury has not been shown to compromise outcomes in terms of bony union and occlusion. Substance abuse appears to be associated with a greater rate of infection. Read the full article in The Laryngoscope.

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Head and Neck, Practice Focus, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: mandible fracture, outcomes, surgeryIssue: February 2013

You Might Also Like:

  • The Importance of Timing in Mandible Fracture Repair
  • Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures Should Be Screened for Concussion
  • Erich Arch Bar Use Declines in Favor of Manual Reduction in Mandible Fracture Management
  • What Is the Evidence for Open Versus Closed Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Fractures In Adults?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you successfully navigated a mid-career change?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?

    • Physician, Know Thyself! Tips for Navigating Mid-Career Transitions in Otolaryngology

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
    • Journal Publishing Format Suggestion: A Greener Future for Medical Journals
    • Physician, Know Thyself! Tips for Navigating Mid-Career Transitions in Otolaryngology
    • PA Reform: Is the Administrative War of Attrition Ending?
    • How To: Anatomic-Based Technique for Sensing Lead Placement in Hypoglossal Stimulator Implantation

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939