• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Kartush Facial Nerve Monitoring Protocol

by Jack Kartush, MD • May 8, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

1. Ensure anesthesia avoids long-acting muscle relaxants. If in doubt, check train-of-four electromyography (EMG) response.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Facial Nerve Integrity Monitoring of Value in Chronic Ear Surgery?
  • Otologists Report Greater Widespread Use of Intra-Operative Facial Nerve Monitoring
  • Nerve Monitoring System Can Help Identify Functional Separation between Branches of Hypoglossal Nerve
  • How To: Using Modified Dragonfly Electrode for Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring in Pediatric Surgery
Explore This Issue
May 2014

2. Be wary of local anesthetics (lidocaine or bupivacaine), which can chemically induce a temporary facial paresis, rendering monitoring useless.

3. Place bipolar electrodes in ipsilateral orbicularis oculi and oris. Use uniform color coding for electrodes = “blue eyes, red lips.” The electrode pair should be close to, but not touching, each other.

4. Place a green ground electrode in sternum above a white anode electrode.

5. Plug the electrodes into proper channels on the patient interface box, preferably color coded to match the above protocol.

6. Ensure that the electrode impedance is less than 5 kOhm and that the interelectrode impedance is less than 1 kOhm for each electrode pair.

7. Perform a tap test on the skin surface above the electrodes to elicit an artifactual response (which only tests the recording portion of the system).

8. Adjust the volume of the nerve monitor so that it can be heard above the ambient noise of the OR.

9. Once the procedure has begun, always confirm that current flow is present by using a stimulating probe or Kartush surgical instrument to touch muscle, soft tissue, or wet bone. These tissues conduct nearly 100% of the current due to their low impedance and therefore require less current to elicit a confirmatory. If the monitor confirms proper current flow (visually or audibly), then the stimulating portion of the system has been appropriately confirmed.

10. Obtain a baseline response to stimulation at an early point in surgery, before any significant nerve manipulation is performed. If the nerve is visible, initial stim levels of 0.5mA to 0.8mA are appropriate. If the nerve is covered in bone, granulation tissue, cholesteatoma, or tumor, progressively increase the initial stim up to 2mA. Once an initial baseline response has been recorded, the integrity of the entire stim and recording system has been properly confirmed.

11. Stim during surgical dissection. If surgical dissection is required along the facial nerve, titrate the optimal stim levels based on nerve proximity and intervening tissue. Higher stim levels should be used to “map” the general location of the nerve and then lowered once it is found.

Stim levels as low as 0.1mA are often sufficient when dissecting along the bare nerve in the cerebellopontine angle. During cholesteatoma dissection along a slightly dehiscent tympanic facial nerve, 0.5 – 0.8mA may be more appropriate to alert the surgeon when the dehiscence is below the stim probe or stimulating dissection instrument.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Online Exclusives, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus, Special Reports Tagged With: facial nerve monitoringIssue: May 2014

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Facial Nerve Integrity Monitoring of Value in Chronic Ear Surgery?
  • Otologists Report Greater Widespread Use of Intra-Operative Facial Nerve Monitoring
  • Nerve Monitoring System Can Help Identify Functional Separation between Branches of Hypoglossal Nerve
  • How To: Using Modified Dragonfly Electrode for Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring in Pediatric Surgery

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939