ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

The 21st Century Cures Act

by Karen Appold • August 15, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version
© James Steidl / shutterstock.com

© James Steidl / shutterstock.com

The 21st Century Cures Act, also known as the Cures Act, provides the National Institutes of Health (NIH) with critical tools and resources to advance biomedical research across the spectrum, from foundational basic research studies to advanced clinical trials of promising new therapies. Both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate passed it with strong bipartisan support, and it became law on December 13, 2016.

You Might Also Like

No related posts.

Explore This Issue
August 2017

The legislation provides $4.8 billion in funding to four highly innovative scientific initiatives over the next 10 years, including the All of Us Research Program, formerly known as the PMI Cohort Program ($1.45 billion), the Brain Research through Advancing Innovative Neurotechnologies (BRAIN) Initiative ($1.5 billion), Cancer Moonshot ($1.8 billion), and the Regenerative Medicine Innovation Project ($30 million) (See Table 1).

“Funding to the NIH has been one of the most critical drivers of improved health in the world,” said Joseph E. Kerschner, MD, professor of otolaryngology, microbiology, and immunology, dean of the School of Medicine, and executive vice president of the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee. “Virtually every disorder that an otolaryngologist comes into contact with has been altered, with improved patient outcomes, because of NIH-funded research. Specifically, the Cures Act includes increased funding to the NIH for cancer research—including cancer of the head and neck—which has the tremendous potential to make significant progress toward improved care and survival rates. Other areas of emphasis include funding for research in opioid use, behavioral health, and access to healthcare, which are critical areas impacting otolaryngologists and their patients.”

Baldwin Wong, chief of the Science Policy and Planning Branch of the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) in Bethesda, Md., believes the act supports the NIDCD’s mission and will benefit the field of otolaryngology in many ways. The NIDCD is one of 27 NIH institutes and centers within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Here’s a closer look at each of the four initiatives.

Joseph E. Kerschner, MDFunding to the NIH has been one of the most critical drivers of improved health in the world. Virtually every disorder that an otolaryngologist comes into contact with has been altered, with improved patient outcomes because of NIH-funded research. —Joseph E. Kerschner, MD

All of Us Research Program

For this program, NIH will recruit one million or more adult volunteers in the United States to participate in a study to accelerate research for a wide range of diseases and improve the understanding of health. “Participants will provide information about their medical history and lifestyles on a questionnaire and may also be asked to provide physical measurements or donate a blood or urine sample,” Wong said. “Individuals with communication disorders could be part of this volunteer group, as the study aims to reach a cross-section of the country.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: 21st century cures act, biomedical research, national institutes of health, NIH, otolaryngologyIssue: August 2017

You Might Also Like:

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Neurogenic Cough Is Often a Diagnosis of Exclusion
    • Why We Get Colds
    • Are the Jobs in Healthcare Good Jobs?
    • What Really Works in Functional Rhinoplasty?
    • Is the Best Modality to Assess Vocal Fold Mobility in Children Flexible Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy or Ultrasound?
    • Three Primary Treatment Strategies Show No Differences in Swallow Outcome for Patients with Low- to Intermediate-Risk Tonsil Cancer

Polls

Do you have physician assistants in your otolaryngology practice?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookie Preferences

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2023 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939