• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

December 1, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Bottom line: For these young children, bilateral cochlear implantation seemed to generate a significant benefit in spatial acuity tasks, compared with unilateral cochlear implant usage. Sound localization skill began to approach the level of the study participants with normal hearing. Longer usage with bilateral cochlear implants was associated with better performance.

You Might Also Like

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
Explore This Issue
December 2012

Reference: Grieco-Calub TM, Litovsky RY. Spatial acuity in 2-to-3-year-old children with normal acoustic hearing, unilateral cochlear implants, and bilateral cochlear implants. Ear Hear. 2012;33(5):561-572.

—Reviewed by George Hashisaki, MD

SSCD Treated with Surgical Plugging

Does surgical plugging of a dehiscent superior semicircular canal affect hearing outcome?

Background: A low frequency conductive hearing loss has been associated with superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). A theoretical explanation is the presence of a mobile “third window” at the dehiscent area that allows sound pressure energy to be shunted away from the cochlea. This effect would impact air conduction thresholds but not bone conduction thresholds, thus creating an apparent conductive hearing loss.

Study design: Retrospective review of 43 cases of SSCD treated with surgical plugging of the affected superior semicircular canal. Pre-operative and post-operative audiograms were compared.

Setting: Tertiary academic medical center: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore.

Synopsis: The study included 40 patients who underwent a total of 43 repairs of SSCD using a technique of surgical plugging of the superior semicircular canal through a middle cranial fossa approach. All patients had pre-operative and short-term (seven-to-10 day) post-operative audiograms. Thirty-two of the affected 43 ears also had audiograms at more than one month post-operatively (range, one to 15 months; median, three months).

The short-term audiograms showed a slight worsening of bone conduction thresholds across frequencies and persistence of a mild air-bone gap across frequencies. A majority of patients were noted to have fluid or blood in the middle ear.

For the ears with audiograms at longer than one month after surgery, the bone conduction thresholds improved slightly, but a decrease persisted in thresholds at 2000 and 4000 Hz. Air conduction thresholds improved, compared with the short-term audiograms, across frequencies, nearly matching the bone conduction thresholds. In comparison to pre-operative audiograms, there was improvement in the low frequency conductive hearing loss, but there was evidence of a new sensorineural hearing loss at 4000 and 8000 Hz.

Bottom line: The low frequency conductive hearing loss seen in some patients with SSCD is corrected by surgical plugging of the dehiscence. In addition, the procedure was associated with a new mild sensorineural hearing loss in 25 percent of the study participants.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Head and Neck, Laryngology, Literature Reviews, Online Exclusives, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implant, hearing loss, HPV, temporal bone defect, vocal foldIssue: December 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies
  • Literature Review: A Roundup of Important Recent Studies

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939