• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Local Nasal Immunotherapy Safe, Effective for Allergic Rhinitis

by Linda Kossoff • August 18, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the clinical and immunological efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR)?

BOTTOM LINE

You Might Also Like

  • SCIT Effective for Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
  • Immunotherapy Benefits for Treating Allergic Rhinitis
  • Sublingual Immunotherapy a Potential Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Is Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation Effective in Treating Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis?

LNIT is a safe alternative immunotherapy route that improves clinical symptoms, reduces medication usage, and increases the nasal provocation threshold.

BACKGROUND: Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only available curative treatment for AR. LNIT, the induction of immunotolerance in the nasal cavity, is less invasive and time-consuming than commonly used subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT).

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

SETTING: Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Division of Rhinology and Allergy, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers employed the Ovid, MEDLINE, and Embase databases to search for randomized controlled trials comparing LNIT and placebo. Study criteria were inclusive of any adult or pediatric patients who met diagnostic criteria for AR, and any allergen, type of preparation, delivery, dosage, or duration. The 20 included studies had a combined total of 698 participants. Outcomes were total nasal symptom score (TNSS), symptom–medication score (SMS), medication score, immunological assessment, and nasal provocation threshold. Results showed the LNIT group had greater post-treatment improvement in TNSS, SMS, and medication score. Itching had the highest degree of improvement, followed by sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal obstruction. Immunological assessments showed no significant differences in serum-specific IgE or nasal eosinophil cationic protein. Only serum IgG significantly increased with LNIT, and the post-treatment nasal provocation threshold was higher with LNIT. No significant adverse events were reported.

CITATION: Kasemsuk N, Ngaotepprutaram P, Kanjanawasee D, et al. Local nasal immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022;12:1503–1516.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Practice Focus, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: allergic rhinitis, immunotherapy

You Might Also Like:

  • SCIT Effective for Asthma, Allergic Rhinitis
  • Immunotherapy Benefits for Treating Allergic Rhinitis
  • Sublingual Immunotherapy a Potential Treatment for Allergic Rhinitis
  • Is Posterior Nasal Nerve Ablation Effective in Treating Symptoms of Allergic Rhinitis?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you successfully navigated a mid-career change?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Changing Perspectives: Why ENT Surgeons Should Consider Nerve Reconstruction

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • ENTtoday Welcomes Resident Editorial Board Members
    • Journal Publishing Format Suggestion: A Greener Future for Medical Journals
    • Physician, Know Thyself! Tips for Navigating Mid-Career Transitions in Otolaryngology
    • PA Reform: Is the Administrative War of Attrition Ending?
    • How To: Anatomic-Based Technique for Sensing Lead Placement in Hypoglossal Stimulator Implantation

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939