• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Losing Sleep over Residents’ Work Week Restrictions

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • March 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Dr. Johns explained that hospitalists manage medical issues, calling in subspecialty residents as needed. The 15 otolaryngology residents deployed in three hospitals serve mostly as consultants and co-managers, with an average daily census of six to eight patients per facility. For example, a hospitalist might call in an otolaryngology, ophthalmology, or neurology resident for a patient with periorbital cellulitis. Dr. Johns said hospitalists allow his program to meet its educational goals without exceeding work hour restrictions. There are fewer battles over ER patients, things flow more smoothly, and care quality is high. The hospitalist-subspecialty resident paradigm works, and residents gain considerable control over their professional lives. Dr. Johns sees the 80-hour work week as a blunt instrument to correct fatigue, burnout, and depersonalization.

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
Explore This Issue
March 2009

The view is different from the hospitalist’s side of the street. William Odette Jr., MD, a full-time IPC hospitalist at Tucson Medical Center in Arizona, has seven full-time and eight part-time colleagues, including a nocturnalist. The team handles an average of 120 admissions and consults a day, and distributes call equally. Dr. Odette said, Our hospital doesn’t rise or fall with the residents because the hospitalist is the responsible attending. The hospitalist admits with the resident handling orders, but the hospitalist supervises and provides continuity of care. Subspecialty residents, including otolaryngologists, are called in to co-manage patients.

Although residents are supposed to cover call, Dr. Odette said that at least one-third of the time the nurses call the hospitalist because the residents, who are paged automatically, don’t respond. They’re not putting in an 80-hour week, in my opinion, he concluded.

His fellow IPC hospitalist Douglas Kirkpatrick, DO, a pulmonologist and critical care specialist, finds it annoying that residents often can’t be found and that nurses page the hospitalists instead. The upside is that the hospitalists provide more seamless care, avoiding awkward and time-consuming handoffs. Dr. Kirkpatrick is accessible to his residents, working long hours the day before covering call, arranging for residents to round at the bedside of interesting and complex cases, and supporting them as they practice procedures. Often the residents don’t realize how much we do. We even model for them how to make a smooth transition from inpatient to outpatient, directing them to case management, calling the PCP, and so on, he said.

For teaching hospitals, adding hospitalists to cover the workload formerly carried by residents involves increased faculty pay without significantly increasing professional fee revenue. Although expecting financial self-sufficiency of such programs is unrealistic, some programs incrementally increase consultative revenue as specialty patients get placed on general medical services rather than being cared for by a resident and a specialist attending.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Health Policy, Practice Management, Sleep Medicine Issue: March 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939