• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Losing Sleep over Residents’ Work Week Restrictions

by Marlene Piturro, PhD, MBA • March 1, 2009

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Medical residents used to work shifts so long that fatigue blurred their vision, clouded their judgment, and overall put them on the brink of mental and physical exhaustion. Concern among medical educators and pressure from consumer groups that hypothesized a link, thus far unproven, between medical resident fatigue and unsafe patient care prompted the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) in 2003 to enact an 80-hour work week limitation on residents. Studies since then of the impact of decreased resident work hours are underwhelming; patient safety and mortality remain largely unchanged since the regulations went into effect. That didn’t stop the Institute of Medicine, after a 15-month study concluded in December 2008, from proposing additional resident work hour restrictions, with an estimated price tag of $1.7 trillion to an already cash-starved health care system (see sidebar above).

You Might Also Like

  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours
Explore This Issue
March 2009
Figure. Dr. Douglas Kirkpatrick (bottom left) with his team of residents at Tucson Medical Center.

click for large version
Figure. Dr. Douglas Kirkpatrick (bottom left) with his team of residents at Tucson Medical Center.

Michael Stewart, MD, MPH, Chairman of the Department of Otorhinolaryngology at New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center (and an editorial board member of ENT Today), who works with a four-resident team, disagrees with the IOM’s recent recommendations. The 2003 work hour restrictions led us to a fairer distribution of the workload among residents, with the junior residents getting more time to read, study, and prepare, he said. But they have also caused less continuity of care, more handoffs, and residents being forced to forgo important educational opportunities even when they aren’t tired. The rules are too rigid.

This comes from a physician whose hospital housed the sentinel event precipitating work hour restrictions-Libby Zion’s death in 1984. That unfortunate medical outcome-in which second-year resident Gregg Stone, MD, after consulting with the attending physician, prescribed Demerol for Ms. Zion’s extreme shaking, not knowing that Ms. Zion had taken Nardil and cocaine-led to monitoring of residents’ duty hours. The assumption that fatigue rather than Ms. Zion’s failure to mention her drug cocktail to Dr. Stone precipitated resident work hour restrictions, in effect in New York since 1989.

The Elephant in the Hospital

While the IOM spent 15 months pondering resident duty hours, it apparently failed to notice the huge workload that the 25,000+ hospitalists in US hospitals have taken from residents’ shoulders (see Hospitalists’ Blueprint below). Michael Johns III, MD, Chief of Otolaryngology at Emory Crawford Long Hospital in Atlanta, and Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology at Emory University School of Medicine (and a member of the ENT Today editorial board), works closely with Emory’s hospitalist cadre, the nation’s largest. We get along very well with them. Patients historically admitted to us now go through the hospitalists and that removed a huge burden on house staff, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Career Development, Health Policy, Practice Management, Sleep Medicine Issue: March 2009

You Might Also Like:

  • Otolaryngologists View Resident Work-Hour Restrictions: ACS calls for in-depth investigation before mandating further restrictions
  • Resident Restructure: Attendings adjust to new work-hour rules
  • Work Hour Limits for Medical Residents Spur Otolaryngologists to Rethink Patient Handoffs
  • ACGME Revises Cap on Resident Work Hours

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?
    • What Is the Optimal Anticoagulation in HGNS Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Cardiac Comorbidities?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939