• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Managing End-of-Life Care for Patients with Advanced Otolaryngic Cancers

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • September 15, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Understanding preexisting attitudes of patients and their caregivers regarding quality of life versus quantity of life may help otolaryngologists determine how to better use healthcare resources for end-of-life care.

You Might Also Like

  • Patient Navigators Promote Timely, Efficient Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • ‘Patient-Centered Approach’ Delivers High-Quality Care to Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • Otolaryngology Training Short on End-of-Life Care Advice
  • American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Focused on Advocacy, Patient Care

This conclusion came from a recent study that examined the preexisting attitudes of patients, caregivers, and otolaryngologists that influence decisions regarding end-of-life resource allocation. The researchers found that patients with cancer and their caregivers have preferences that differ from otolaryngologists when it comes to end-of-life care.

“Preexisting attitudes on quality versus quantity made generally no difference in how physicians allocated palliative care and level of cancer treatment, while preexisting attitudes in patient and caregivers significantly impacted these allocations in palliative care and level of cancer treatment,” said senior author Walter T. Lee, MD, co-director of the Head and Neck Program at Duke Cancer Institute in Durham, N.C.

In the study, data on baseline attitudes toward quality versus quantity of life were collected from 767 participating otolaryngologists, 146 patients with advanced cancer, and 114 caregivers. The study found that end-of-life decision making by cancer patients and their caregivers was significantly affected by quality of life and a preference for resource allocation to palliative care and other medical care versus treatment for cancer.

For otolaryngologists, however, end-of-life decision making was not influenced by preexisting attitudes. According to Dr. Lee, these results suggest that otolaryngologists should take time to understand patient attitudes to help allocate resources at end of life that are congruent with the patient wishes.

“These conversations can occur over multiple visits with patients and their caregivers,” he said, adding that otolaryngologists should get to know and understand the resources available at their medical centers, such as family counseling and social workers, to assist patients and their families with end-of-life decisions.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Online Exclusives, Practice Focus Tagged With: cancer, palliative care

You Might Also Like:

  • Patient Navigators Promote Timely, Efficient Care for Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • ‘Patient-Centered Approach’ Delivers High-Quality Care to Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • Otolaryngology Training Short on End-of-Life Care Advice
  • American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Focused on Advocacy, Patient Care

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • 22 Symptoms Common to Patients with Superior Canal Dehiscence Syndrome

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939