• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Match Applicants Uncomfortable with Some Types of Post-Interview Contact

by ENTtoday • September 16, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Comment: This article relates to the residency match experience, which I think is important in our current situation of an increasing number of programs going unmatched. The study says that interviewees report significant match communication violations, which cause distress and violate the NRMP code of conduct. Adhering to this code will improve the interview process for both applicants and programs alike and make this a less stressful and intimidating process. —Tanya K. Meyer, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Navigating Ethical Challenges During the Otolaryngology Match Experience
  • Intersectional Analysis of the Otolaryngology Match Confirms White Male Advantage
  • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
  • Will Otolaryngology Match Numbers Continue to Rise?
Explore This Issue
September 2018

How would policy changes to National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) post-interview behaviors affect applicant distress?

Background: The NRMP’s Institutional, Program, and Applicant Match Participation Agreement (MPA) and Code of Conduct (COC) were established to prohibit undesirable interview behaviors and forbid coercion of applicants to declare a program’s ranking. Significant improvements have been made, but there is evidence of interview behavior that violates the spirit of the match during the post-interview period.

Study design: An anonymous, 31-question survey sent to residency candidates applying to eight residency programs at a single academic institution.

Setting: Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Synopsis: A total of 2,079 (31%) recipients responded. Of those, 72% were asked at least once about other interviews. A total of 38% were asked at least once about marital status, and 15% at least once how highly they would rank a program. Questions arose at similar rates for men and women except one: Although a total of 17% were asked at least once about children, women were asked 50% more frequently than men. Overall, 91% engaged in post-interview communication at one or more of the programs at which they interviewed (77% initiated the contact). Seventy percent of all applicants informed their top program they had ranked it highly, and 20% of applicants reported changing their rank list based on post-interview communication. Sixty-one percent of respondents would feel distress at knowing a program had ranked them to match prior to the rank order list deadline because of a pressure to affirm mutual interest. Overall, 71% of respondents would feel relieved if post-interview communication was explicitly discouraged by programs, while 50% said post-interview communication was fine if no NRMP rules were violated. Limitations included potential recall bias and bias toward negative experiences, a relatively low response rate, and single institution participation.

Bottom line: Applicants to several residency programs reported being asked questions that violate the NRMP COC, and the majority would prefer post-interview communication to be more regulated and less prevalent.

Citation: Berruiochoa C, Reddy CA, Dorsey S, et al. The residency match: Interview experiences, postinterview communication, and associated distress. J Grad Med Ed. 2018;10:403–408.

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: match, National Resident Matching Program, NRMPIssue: September 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • Navigating Ethical Challenges During the Otolaryngology Match Experience
  • Intersectional Analysis of the Otolaryngology Match Confirms White Male Advantage
  • Is There a Crisis in the Otolaryngology Match?
  • Will Otolaryngology Match Numbers Continue to Rise?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939