• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Middle Turbinate Variations Don’t Justify Sinus Surgery

by John M. DelGaudio, MD • November 5, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Are anatomic variations of the middle turbinate (MT), such as concha bullosa and paradoxical MT, associated with nasal septal deviation or chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)?

Background: CRS has multiple underlying causes. Although anatomic variations of nasal and sinus structures have been implicated as a possible risk factor for CRS, there is no agreement in the literature.

You Might Also Like

  • Sinus Surgery Improves Olfaction for About Half of Patients with CRS
  • Concurrent Septoplasty Does Not Affect CRS-Specific Health-Related QOL
  • Sleep Improves after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With or Without OSA
  • Tissue Eosinophil Aggregates May Drive Increased Post-Sinus Surgery Prednisone Requirements
Explore This Issue
November 2011

Study design: Comparative CT study.

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Synopsis: CT scans of 73 control patients and 461 patients with sinonasal complaints were evaluated for the presence of MT anatomic variations (concha bullosa and paradoxical MT), nasal septal deviation and CRS. The presence of MT variations was correlated with nasal septal deviation and the presence of CRS.

There was no difference in the incidence of MT anatomic variation or septal deviation between controls and symptomatic patients. MT variation was found to correlate with deviation of the nasal septum to the contralateral side, but there was no relationship between MT variation or septal deviation and CRS.

Bottom line: Middle turbinate anatomic variation is associated with contralateral nasal septal deviation, but this study shows no correlation with CRS. When surgery of the MTs is performed, it should be conservative. The presence of MT variations in the absence of CRS is not a justification for sinus surgery.

Citation: Cho JH, Park M, Chung YS, et al. Do anatomic variations of the middle turbinate have an effect on nasal septal deviation or paranasal sinusitis? Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011;120(9):569-574.

—Reviewed by John M. DelGaudio, MD

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Rhinology Tagged With: chronic rhinosinusitis, clincal, CRS, middle turbinate, MT, nasal septal deviation, sinus surgeryIssue: November 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Sinus Surgery Improves Olfaction for About Half of Patients with CRS
  • Concurrent Septoplasty Does Not Affect CRS-Specific Health-Related QOL
  • Sleep Improves after Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in Patients With or Without OSA
  • Tissue Eosinophil Aggregates May Drive Increased Post-Sinus Surgery Prednisone Requirements

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939