• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Milestones in Development of Cochlear Implant Technology

by Gretchen Henkel • September 8, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version
William F. House, MD, with Tracy Husted, the first pediatric cochlear implant patient (Los Angeles, 1981).

William F. House, MD, with Tracy Husted, the first pediatric cochlear implant patient (Los Angeles, 1981).
Image Credit: House Research Institute

The roots of cochlear implant (CI) technology go back more than 200 years to the 1790s, when Alessandro Volta, who developed the electric battery, placed metal probes into his own ears and connected them to a 50-volt circuit. Upon switching on the flow of current, he experienced a jolt, but, more importantly for auditory science, he also heard a noise.

You Might Also Like

  • History of the Cochlear Implant
  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • Hybrid Cochlear Implant Helps Preserve Residual Low-Frequency Hearing
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients
Explore This Issue
September 2015

Since then, many others have contributed to the development of this technology, which is used by more than 219,000 patients worldwide.

Here is a look at some of the critical junctures in the development of CI technology that took place in the second half of the 20th century, fed by advancements from investigators around the world.


1901 (Paris): Eyriès implants Djourno’s coils; alternating current transmitted to the coil produces perception of sound.
1960–61 (Los Angeles): William House and John Doyle begin work on prosthesis; effect electrical stimulation during stapes surgery; implant three patients with a single gold electrode.
1969–70 (Los Angeles): House implants first hardwire five-electrode system in three patients.
1970–71 (San Francisco): Researchers at UC San Francisco implant three patients using a gold two-electrode system and perform a bipolar scala tympani procedure, efforts that would later coalesce into Advanced Bionics.
1972 (Los Angeles): First wearable CI device and first induction system, using a centering coil and attaching magnet, are developed by House’s team.
1973–76 (Paris): Claude-Henri Chouard pioneers the 12-electrode array.
1977–78 (Vienna): Team led by Erwin Hochmair designs and manufactures a passive single-channel broadband analog implant, efforts that later lead to the founding of MED-EL.
1977 (Washington, DC): A team of researchers at the University of Pittsburgh produces and publishes the Bilger Report, which lends credibility to the efficacy of CIs and leads to National Institutes of Health research support.
1978 (Melbourne, Australia): Graeme Clark and colleagues develop multi-channel prototype with an array of 20 electrodes, efforts that would later lead to the founding of Cochlear Ltd., a branch of Nucleus, manufacturer of heart pacemakers.
1978 (Los Angeles, Indiana, and other sites): First multicenter trial of CIs.
1984 (Silver Spring, Md.): FDA approves the House/3M single-channel implant for adults.
1987–2000 (Silver Spring, Md.): FDA approves multiple-channel implant for adults (1985), multiple-channel CI for children two years of age and older (1990), multiple-channel CI for children 18 months and older (1998), and multiple-channel CI for infants one year of age (2000).
Early 1990s: Robert V. Shannon and colleagues develop a noise-band vocoder that simulates CI processing, discovering that four bands of modulated noise are sufficient to allow high levels of speech understanding (Science. 1995;270:303-304)

Pages: 1 2 | Multi-Page

Filed Under: Features, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implantIssue: September 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • History of the Cochlear Implant
  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • Hybrid Cochlear Implant Helps Preserve Residual Low-Frequency Hearing
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939