• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Mixing Vials of Allergy Drugs in the Office: Safety Standards and Testing

by Margot Fromer • November 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

WASHINGTON, DC—Compounding sterile medications for parenteral use, such as allergy drugs, in a private physician’s office is potentially subject to almost as much scrutiny and regulation as are visited upon commercial preparers of such medicines.

You Might Also Like

  • Proposed Vial Mixing Standard May Have Adverse Effects for Otolaryngologists
  • HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards for the Electronic Office
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Focused on Advocacy, Patient Care
Explore This Issue
November 2007

Otolaryngologists, with their many allergy patients, are among the specialists most affected by these rules, regulations, and standards. These standards have been established in order to reduce some of the 17 billion adverse medical events that occur each year in the United States. Of that number, 44,000 deaths result from medical error, of which mistakes in mixing and compounding allergy medicines are a part.

USP: The Gold Standard

Steven M. Houser, MD, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, told the miniseminar audience that the US Pharmacopeia (USP) is the gold standard of vial mixing. He said that although USP is not a government entity, it does have enforcement power, and it is the basis for procedure and safety in compounding sterile medications for parenteral use. USP has five major criteria in this area:

  • Preventing microbial contamination (maintaining sterility).
  • Removing excessive bacterial endotoxins from the medications.
  • Eliminating variability in the strength of correct ingredients.
  • Preventing unintended chemical and physical contamination.
  • Using only correct types and qualities of ingredients in sterile preparations.

To achieve these objectives, USP has developed a manual that covers in minute detail the steps to be taken and the correct procedure to be followed for compounded sterile preparations (CSPs). Chapter 797, Pharmaceutical Compounding—Sterile Preparations, pertains to private physician offices, and it is with this document that most of the miniseminar was concerned.

Chapter 797 went into effect on January 1, 2004, and covers a wide range of topics about compounding sterile preparations, labeling, and storage. The standards are enforced by the Food and Drug Administration and state boards of pharmacy. The Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has adopted the USP guidelines, but JCAHO is interested mostly in hospital pharmacies, which, in many cases, check and test procedures in physicians’ offices.

Sandra Lin, MD

Sandra Lin, MD

CSPs are administered to patients via application, implantation, infusion, inhalation, injection, insertion, instillation, and irrigation. There are four categories of CSPs: low risk, medium risk, high risk, and immediate use. Physician office preparation falls into the medium risk category.

Figure. The most critical component in the preparation of CSPs is maintenance of sterility—in the compound itself and in the area where it is mixed.

click for large version
Figure. The most critical component in the preparation of CSPs is maintenance of sterility—in the compound itself and in the area where it is mixed.

CSPs are defined as biologics, diagnostics, drugs, nutrients, and radiopharmaceuticals, all of which are manufactured sterile products that must be prepared in a physician’s office according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Allergy, Practice Focus Issue: November 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Proposed Vial Mixing Standard May Have Adverse Effects for Otolaryngologists
  • HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards for the Electronic Office
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Focused on Advocacy, Patient Care

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939