• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Mixing Vials of Allergy Drugs in the Office: Safety Standards and Testing

by Margot Fromer • November 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The most critical component in preparation of CSPs is maintenance of sterility—in the compound itself and in the area where it is mixed. This pertains to both the physical plant and facilities and the personnel themselves. USP standards include the following in the office of a physician who prepares and mixes allergy vials:

You Might Also Like

  • Proposed Vial Mixing Standard May Have Adverse Effects for Otolaryngologists
  • HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards for the Electronic Office
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Focused on Advocacy, Patient Care
Explore This Issue
November 2007
  • An anteroom where personnel wash their hands in a prescribed manner and don sterile garb. It is also a transition room that provides assurance that pressure relationships are constantly maintained so that air flows from clean to dirty areas and that reduces the need for heating, ventilating, and air conditioning.
  • Attention to the beyond-use date (a certain number of days after the preparation was compounded), at which time it must be discarded.
  • A ventilated biological safety cabinet for personnel and products, having an open front with inward airflow for personnel protection and filtered laminar airflow for product protection.
  • A buffer area or room where preparation and staging of components take place.
  • A clean room in which the compounds are mixed.
  • Disinfectant, a chemical agent that destroys disease-causing pathogens.
  • Appropriate labeling on all containers used to mix the compounds, as well as those that contain the compounds themselves, with name, ingredients, date mixed —and by whom they were prepared.
  • Terminal sterilization for sealed containers to achieve a predetermined sterility level. This is usually accomplished by steam under pressure or autoclave.

Compounding Personnel

Compounding personnel are responsible for ensuring that CSPs are accurately identified, measured, diluted, and mixed, and are correctly purified, sterilized, packaged, sealed, labeled, stored, dispensed, and distributed. These performance responsibilities include maintaining appropriate cleanliness and conditions and providing labeling and supplementary instructions for the proper clinical administration of CSPs.

Compounding supervisors must ensure, through either direct measurement or appropriate information sources, that specific CSPs maintain their labeled strength within USP-designated limits, or within 10% if not specified, until their beyond-use dates. All CSPs should be prepared in a manner that maintains sterility and minimizes introduction of particulate matter.

A written quality assurance procedure includes the following in-process checks that are applied, as appropriate, to specific CSPs: accuracy and precision of measuring and weighing; the requirement for sterility; methods of sterilization and purification; safe limits and ranges for strength of ingredients, bacterial endotoxins, particulate matter, and pH; labeling accuracy and completeness; beyond-use date assignment; and packaging and storage requirements. When appropriate and practical, the dispenser must obtain and evaluate results of testing for identity, strength, purity, and sterility before a CSP is dispensed. Qualified, licensed health care professionals who supervise compounding and dispensing of CSPs are required to ensure that certain objectives are achieved.

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Allergy, Practice Focus Issue: November 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Proposed Vial Mixing Standard May Have Adverse Effects for Otolaryngologists
  • HIPAA Privacy and Security Standards for the Electronic Office
  • FDA Approves First Sublingual Allergy Immunotherapy Agents
  • American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Focused on Advocacy, Patient Care

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939