• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

MRI Surveillance Helpful Following Vestibular Schwannoma Resection

by Sue Pondrom • September 17, 2014

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Clinical Question: What are the clinical and radiologic variables associated with recurrence using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) following vestibular schwannoma (VS) resection?

Background: Although the primary goal of surgery for VS is complete tumor removal, in a subset of patients, adherent tumor remnants may be left behind intentionally to preserve neural integrity. However, there is no consensus regarding an optimal post-operative MRI surveillance schedule.

You Might Also Like

  • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
  • Measuring Vestibular Schwannoma Signal Intensity on Enhanced MRI May Help Predict Growth
  • Surveillance Recommendations Following Resection of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma
  • How Should DVT Chemoprophylaxis Be Applied Following Vestibular Schwannoma Resection?
Explore This Issue
February 2012

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Radiology, Department of Neurologic Surgery and Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo School of Graduate Medical Education, Rochester, Minn.

Synopsis: Of 350 patients who underwent microsurgical VS resection, 203 met study criteria for the time period of 2000 to 2010. Stable enhancement patterns were seen in 24.5 percent of patients, regression in 66 percent and resolution in 3.5 percent. Those receiving subtotal resection were more than nine times more likely to experience recurrence compared to those undergoing near total or gross total resection. Nodular enhancement on the initial post-operative MRI was associated with a 16-fold increased risk for future recurrence compared with those with linear patterns. Among those with nodular enhancement on baseline post-operative MRI, a maximum linear diameter of > 15 mm or volume of > 0.4 cm was associated with an approximate five-fold increase in risk for future growth.

Bottom line: While MRI enhancement within the post-surgical bed following VS resection is extremely common, making the diagnosis of tumor recurrence difficult, factors such as completeness of resection and baseline post-operative MRI findings provide valuable information regarding risk for recurrence.

Reference: Carlson ML, Van Abel KM, Driscoll CL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging surveillance following vestibular schwannoma resection. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(2):378-388.

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Head and Neck, Literature Reviews, Practice Focus Issue: February 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • MRI Surveillance Should Extend to 10 Years Post- Op for Vestibular Schwannoma Patients
  • Measuring Vestibular Schwannoma Signal Intensity on Enhanced MRI May Help Predict Growth
  • Surveillance Recommendations Following Resection of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma
  • How Should DVT Chemoprophylaxis Be Applied Following Vestibular Schwannoma Resection?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Gap Year for Research: Is It Worth It?
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • What Happens to Medical Students Who Don’t Match?
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939