• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
    • History of Otolaryngology
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Musician Brains May Hold Answers to New Ways to Treat Hearing Loss

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • March 10, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

“If one can hear music, one can hear anything,” said Charles J. Limb, MD, an auditory surgeon specializing in cochlear implantation and associate professor of otolaryngology-head and neck surgery at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine in Baltimore. His research melds two passions of music and medicine in looking at what happens in the brains of musicians that may hold answers to ways to treat people with hearing loss.

You Might Also Like

  • Considerable Gaps between Self-Reported Hearing Loss and Receiving Evaluation, Treatment
  • SM12: Options for Hearing Loss are Multiplying
  • Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Hard to Define, Hard to Treat
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients

“Since music is the pinnacle of sound, understanding exactly how it is processed and perceived has enormous implications for how we understand complex auditory perception more broadly and also what it means to have hearing impairment,” he said.

Dr. Limb is combining two lines of research that he hopes someday will help deaf people not only hear again, but hear music again. One line of research is using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to look at neural mechanisms that underlie spontaneous, improvisational creativity in jazz musicians, and the other is looking at how deaf people who receive cochlear implants perceive music.

Results of the first line of inquiry were recently published in in PLOS ONE. The study looked at the neurobiology of interactive musical communication by using fMRI to scan the brains of jazz musicians engaged in “trading fours,” a technique in which jazz musicians spontaneously trade improvised material in four measure segments. The study found that musical discourse (the exchange between musicians engaged in trading fours) engages language areas of the brain showing an overlap between music and language processing. However, the study also found evidence suggesting a fundamental difference between the way in which meaning is conveyed in language and music based on the findings that the areas of the brain involved in semantic processing for language are not involved in spontaneous musical exchange.

Along with this research, Dr. Limb is looking at why music perception, e.g., pitch and timbre perception, is so poor in people who have cochlear implants. His hope is that “somebody who is deaf can regain their hearing and one day hope to hear something as strikingly beautiful, and difficult, as music.”

Filed Under: Online Exclusives, Otology/Neurotology, Practice Focus Tagged With: cochlear implant, hearing loss, music

You Might Also Like:

  • Considerable Gaps between Self-Reported Hearing Loss and Receiving Evaluation, Treatment
  • SM12: Options for Hearing Loss are Multiplying
  • Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Hard to Define, Hard to Treat
  • New Cochlear Implant Improves Hearing in Subset of Patients

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you think GLP-1s are the next big disruptors in ENT practice?

View Results

Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • The Example We Set: Thoughts on the End of Residency Training
  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board: Deadline Extended
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • How to Avoid These 10 Difficult Airway Pitfalls
    • History of the Cochlear Implant
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name
    • Facial Nerve Paralysis: Protecting the Eye and Restoring Function
    • Multi-Institutional Validation of the Interarytenoid Assessment Protocol for Pediatric Laryngeal Cleft
    • DB-OTO Gene Therapy for Inherited Deafness
    • Wearable AR for Nystagmus Examination in Patients with Vertigo: Randomized Crossover Usability Study
    • Increased Prevalence of Hearing Loss and Tinnitus in Patients with Retinal Vein Occlusion

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939