• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Skin Cancer

by Jennifer Fink • April 18, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Previous attempts at neoadjuvant therapy weren’t particularly effective. Although physicians in the 1970s and 1980s tried shrinking tumors with chemotherapy prior to surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy “never really caught on for this type of cancer,” Dr. Gross said. Intra-arterial chemotherapy has been investigated as a neoadjuvant therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but to date, “no obvious evidence for positive responses has been reported,” according to an article published in Frontiers of Oncology (2018;8:79).

You Might Also Like

  • New Findings Support Use of Cemiplimab as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Dermatologists, Otolaryngologists Differ on Skin Cancer Care
  • What’s New in Immunotherapy?
  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
Explore This Issue
April 2023

Immunotherapy appears to be a game changer. Skin cancers are particularly sensitive to immunotherapy because most are caused by UV damage from the sun, which creates many DNA mutations in cancerous tumors. Administering immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting may be especially beneficial, because “when the bulk of the tumor is still present, a more profound and broader immune response can be induced,” said Nader Sadeghi, MD, professor and chair of the department of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery at McGill University Health Center in Montreal and director of the McGill Head and Neck Cancer Program. “This is because the cancerous tumor is composed of many heterogeneous colonies of cells, and broader antigen presentation from tumor cells can induce more robust tumor-specific T-cell response.” The hope, he said, is that this immune effect continues after surgery as well.

Though long-term progression-free survival data are not yet available, as neoadjuvant treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is still a relatively novel approach, research to date suggests that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may indeed lead to good outcomes, at least for some patients.

“We now have long-term survival data from the 20 patients who participated in the initial pilot trial, and their responses have been very durable,” Dr. Gross said. “Every single one of the 15 patients who experienced a response to immunotherapy has remained disease-free for an average of 42 months.”

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The first pilot study of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable squamous cell carcinoma used cemiplimab. Patients received two cycles of intravenous cemiplimab every three weeks before surgical resection. Only two doses were given, because physicians (and patients) didn’t want to delay surgery any longer, according to Dr. Gross.

The initial plan called for all enrolled patients to undergo both surgery and adjuvant radiation. “Given the dramatic pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy, however, the majority of patients (60%) did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy … None of these patients developed recurrence.” (Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:4557–4565).

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: HN squamous cell carcinomas, Neoadjuvant ImmunotherapyIssue: April 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • New Findings Support Use of Cemiplimab as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Dermatologists, Otolaryngologists Differ on Skin Cancer Care
  • What’s New in Immunotherapy?
  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939