• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Skin Cancer

by Jennifer Fink • April 18, 2023

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

During the phase two confirmatory trial, physicians were allowed to administer up to four doses of neoadjuvant cemiplimab. “Patients would get two doses, undergo a scan and evaluation, and, if they were responding and not having significant side effects, they could get up to four doses,” Dr. Gross said. “The idea was that maybe we’d see more responses or push some partial responses to a more dramatic response. But we didn’t really see that.”

You Might Also Like

  • New Findings Support Use of Cemiplimab as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Dermatologists, Otolaryngologists Differ on Skin Cancer Care
  • What’s New in Immunotherapy?
  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment
Explore This Issue
April 2023

Seventy-eight percent of patients received all four doses. Disease progression was the most common reason patients did not receive four doses of neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Eighty-seven percent of treated patients reported adverse events; the most common were fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, and rash. Immune-related adverse events occurred in 15% of treatment patients, with grade 3 immune-related adverse events occurring in 4% of patients. Four patients died during the trial—two of heart attacks that “were not considered related” to treatment, according to Dr. Gross; one of COVID-19; and one, age 93, of heart failure that may have been exacerbated by immunotherapy.

Fifty-one percent of patients experienced a pathological complete response; another 13% experienced a pathological major response, and “several patients … were spared function-impairing surgery,” Dr. Gross said. Two patients who presented with bulky disease at baseline experienced progression to inoperable disease (N Engl J Med. 2022;387:1557–1568).

The 63.3% rate of pathologic complete or major pathologic response is “the highest achieved in a multi-center study of single-agent anti-PD-1 neoadjuvant therapy for any solid tumor type,” according to the researchers.

Unanswered Questions

Physicians (and patients) are excited about the potential of neoadjuvant immunotherapy to decrease treatment morbidity and, perhaps, improve survival. But before neoadjuvant immunotherapy can be widely adopted, some unanswered questions must be answered, including:

What impact does neoadjuvant therapy have on survival rates? This question is key to wider adoption of neoadjuvant immunotherapy, according to Kevin S. Emerick, MD, division chief of head and neck surgical oncology and co-director of the Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Multidisciplinary Clinic and Program at Mass Eye and Ear in Boston.

“We have to make sure we’re thinking like surgical oncologists,” Dr. Emerick said. “Does neoadjuvant immunotherapy followed by surgery actually improve our overall cure rates for these patients compared to immunotherapy alone, surgery alone, or the historical approach of surgery followed by radiation?”

Additional clinical trials, including a phase 3 randomized controlled trial comparing neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus surgery and radiation, if indicated, to the current standard of care, will be necessary to answer this question. Dr. Gross said he’s currently in the process of designing a phase 3, multicenter trial.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: HN squamous cell carcinomas, Neoadjuvant ImmunotherapyIssue: April 2023

You Might Also Like:

  • New Findings Support Use of Cemiplimab as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Resectable Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Dermatologists, Otolaryngologists Differ on Skin Cancer Care
  • What’s New in Immunotherapy?
  • A Look at Immunotherapy’s Potential for Head and Neck Cancer Treatment

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939