• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New, Conforming, Easy-to-Use Materials Characterize Developments in Middle Ear Reconstruction

by Paula Moyer • March 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Biocompatible, conforming, and easy-to-use materials-these are the key characteristics of innovations in middle ear reconstruction, according to several experts.

You Might Also Like

  • Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?
  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Is There a “Best” Stapedectomy Prosthesis?
  • Device Offers Effective Alternative to Middle Ear Surgery, Hearing Aids
Explore This Issue
March 2007

Whether the devices are titanium or shape-memory, or whether the prosthetics utilize autologous bone or soldering with laser, the quest is guided by these standards.

These developments are the culmination of years of incremental progress. In this report, ENToday briefly reviews some of the progress of the past decade and then points out recent advances that key opinion leaders consider to be critical.

Size of Prosthesis Influences Surgery Outcome

Glen Knox, MD

Glen Knox, MD

A hallmark study in 1995 had shown that the use of analytical models could predict the size of prostheses needed for optimal results after stapedectomy and tympanomastoid surgery.1 Noting the contribution of mechanical and acoustic models of the human middle ear to gauge the performance of various middle ear reconstructive procedures, the authors noted that model analyses could be used as the rationale for stapes prostheses of 0.6 to 0.8 mm in diameter in order to produce air-bone gaps of less than 12 dB and that, ironically, smaller-diameter prostheses produce larger air-bone gaps. These models also helped establish that the mass of a stapedectomy or ossicular replacement prosthesis could be 16 times greater than that of the stapes with little effect on the hearing result, and that the volume of the middle ear air spaces after tympanomastoid surgery should be at least 0.5 cc for optimal acoustic results. The models also helped establish the effectiveness of the round window graft in certain tympanoplasties as an important parameter determining the hearing result and helped show that the shield should be as rigid as possible to maximize postoperative hearing.

Autologous Incus and Diode Laser Soldering

A later retrospective study of tympanoplasty and ossicular chain reconstruction as a one-stage procedure involved the temporalis fascia for myringoplasty and a sculptured autologous incus to bridge the malleus to the stapes head and the malleus to the footplate.2 Of the 150 patients, 126 (84%) had a healed tympanic membrane three months postoperatively. One year later, 121 (81%) had an intact tympanic membrane, as did 119 (79%) five years later.

At this time, initial studies began to assess the potential use of diode laser soldering as a way to improve the mechanical stability of middle ear reconstruction.3 In that study, investigators evaluated the strength of soldered bonds by assessing the strength of soldered junctions that used fascia, cartilage, bone, and hydroxyapatite with a diode laser consisting of 810-nm wavelength and 50% albumin with 0.1% indocyanine green dye. By comparing the soldered bonds to those obtained with adhesive alone and by soldering 10 hydroxyapatite prostheses that were soldered to the stapes in human cadaver temporal bones, the investigators measured the force required to disrupt the bonds and found that the soldered bonds were significantly stronger.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: March 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?
  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Is There a “Best” Stapedectomy Prosthesis?
  • Device Offers Effective Alternative to Middle Ear Surgery, Hearing Aids

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939