• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New, Conforming, Easy-to-Use Materials Characterize Developments in Middle Ear Reconstruction

by Paula Moyer • March 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Titanium and Shape-Memory Materials

Frank M. Warren, MD

You Might Also Like

  • Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?
  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Is There a “Best” Stapedectomy Prosthesis?
  • Device Offers Effective Alternative to Middle Ear Surgery, Hearing Aids
Explore This Issue
March 2007
Frank M. Warren, MD

Since then, the field has progressed to such innovations as titanium and shaped memory implants, and research on diode laser soldering has continued.

In separate interviews, leading experts discussed their own views regarding the innovations that are shaping the future of middle ear reconstruction.

The newest innovation is the use of stapes titanium implants, said Frank M. Warren, MD, Assistant Professor of Otolaryngology at the University of Utah. The hearing results are very good. Another advantage of titanium is that it is not ferromagnetic, and therefore not affected by a magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] magnet. Therefore, patients who have such implants could subsequently undergo an MRI scan without concern that the prosthesis would interfere with the scan. Titanium is also highly biocompatible and therefore associated with a lower extrusion rate than earlier materials used. It is also effective in closing air-bone gaps and is mechanically sounder and less top-heavy than other prostheses, he said.

Some bridge the gap between the malleus and stapes, and others between a necrosed incus and the stapes superstructure. These prostheses are geometrically complex to allow for the misalignment of the structures, and crimp in order to make the bridge possible.

However, Dr. Warren cautioned that the routine use of cartilage to cover the prosthesis and prevent extrusion is still necessary.

Paul R. Lambert, MD, Professor and Chair of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, agreed with Dr. Warren regarding the impact of titanium implants on the progress in middle ear reconstruction. He called it an ideal ear bone replacement medium for the middle ear, and elaborated on this statement.

The use of titanium implants is the most significant advance in ossicular reconstruction in the last 20 years, he said. Especially, those used as partial or total ossicular replacement prostheses have been important. In my years of otologic work, I’ve used a number of different materials. I began using titanium implants in 2003. I’ve only seen one extrusion in those years.

As did Dr. Warren, Dr. Lambert stressed the biocompatibility of titanium. Another advantage is the lightness of the material, he added. This property makes titanium implants very easy to position, he said. They’re very lightweight, very easy to position, and more secure. We see less displacement of prostheses. We also see better hearing results. Titanium has a hearing improvement of approximately 10 dB compared with other prostheses, he said.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Articles, Clinical, Features Issue: March 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Are Post-Operative Hearing Results Better with Titanium Ossicular Reconstruction Prostheses?
  • Flexible Ossicular Reconstruction Prosthesis Allows for Ease of Placement in Temporal Bone
  • Is There a “Best” Stapedectomy Prosthesis?
  • Device Offers Effective Alternative to Middle Ear Surgery, Hearing Aids

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939