• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Products May Change the Way Tympanostomy Tubes Are Placed

by Jennifer Fink • September 11, 2020

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Jennifer Fink is a freelance medical writer based in Wisconsin.

You Might Also Like

  • Clinical Guidelines Issued for Tympanostomy Tubes in Children
  • Aural Water Protection Makes No Difference Among Children With Tympanostomy Tubes
  • When Should a Retained Tympanostomy Tube Be Removed?
  • What is the Role of Tympanostomy Tubes in the Treatment of Recurrent Acute Otitis Media?
Explore This Issue
September 2020

Stephanie Cajigal is a freelance writer based in Los Angeles.

In-Office Tubes and Cost

Will in-office tube placement save families (and the healthcare system) money? That depends.

Placing tympanostomy tubes in the clinic eliminates anesthesia charges and hospital or ambulatory surgery center facility fees; however, placing the tubes takes significantly longer in office than in the operating room, and some believe that physicians should be compensated at a higher rate for clinic placement of tubes due to this time differential.

“In-office tube placement won’t be widely adopted unless there’s some incremental acknowledgment, in terms of reimbursement, that placing the tube in office is more work,” Dr. Syms said. “This needs to be a win-win-win: The patient, parents, and their pocketbook have to win, the physician has to win, and the insurers and overall healthcare system have to win.”

Because hospitals stand to lose money if tympanostomy tube placement moves into the office, some healthcare systems may be reluctant to offer in-office placement. As of this writing, there is a unique Category III CPT code for the Tula System that will allow insurers to carefully track the costs of the procedure and determine future reimbursement rates.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features, Home Slider Tagged With: clinical care, Otology, pediatric otologyIssue: September 2020

You Might Also Like:

  • Clinical Guidelines Issued for Tympanostomy Tubes in Children
  • Aural Water Protection Makes No Difference Among Children With Tympanostomy Tubes
  • When Should a Retained Tympanostomy Tube Be Removed?
  • What is the Role of Tympanostomy Tubes in the Treatment of Recurrent Acute Otitis Media?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939