• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Speech-Language Pathology Rule: Supervision of videostroboscopy and nasopharyngoscopy no longer required

by Geri Aston • September 2, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The various models included practices in which otolaryngologists performed the two procedures themselves, those in which speech-language pathologists conducted them and a supervising otolaryngologist reviewed the results, and hospital-based clinics in which speech-language pathologists performed the procedures independently upon referral from a primary care physician and then reported back to that doctor.

You Might Also Like

  • Babbling Is Necessary for Speech and Language Development
  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • The Role of Laryngoscopy and Videostroboscopy in Diagnosing Dysphonia
  • Listeners Could Readily Identify Speech Synthesized from Speech Neuroprosthetic Technology
Explore This Issue
September 2011

The January ruling, said Dr. Rosen, “put a spotlight on how otolaryngologists and speech-language pathologists take care of patients with voice problems and bill for their services.” Although otolaryngologists’ opinions on the necessary level of supervision vary, many of them, including Dr. Rosen, are not comfortable with speech-language pathologists performing the two procedures without any supervision from otolaryngologists, Dr. Rosen said.

“If the speech-language pathologist sends a copy of the video to the pediatrician, the primary care physicians, the allergist, the pulmonologist, they don’t know what they’re looking at,” Dr. Rosen added. Before the January move to in-room supervision, he said “it was not uncommon in the United States for there to be no otolaryngology involvement, and the speech-language pathologist was the only person truly viewing that examination.”

In its June 16 letter to Sen. Collins, CMS reversed its decision after a review prompted by widespread objection to the January rule change. In the letter, Dr. Berwick stated that CMS will remove the supervision level effective Oct. 1. “We recognized that, while physicians perform these diagnostic procedures, speech pathologists also perform these procedures to evaluate and treat a patient’s functional/use problems,” he explained.

Initiating a Dialogue

The letter restores Medicare’s previous supervision requirement of no nationally assigned supervision level. “Thus, a properly trained [speech-language pathologist] performing videostroboscopy or nasopharyngoscopy will not need to have a physician on the premises or exercising supervision,” explained a July 13 ASHA press release. Individual Medicare administrative contractors may establish local supervision requirements for these procedures in their speech-language pathology local coverage determinations, ASHA added.

“We are pleased, but we want to assure our otolaryngology colleagues that they’re still in the picture, too,” ASHA’s Dr. White said. He pointed out ASHA’s preferred practice patterns, which state: “All patients/clients with voice disorders are examined by a physician, preferably in a discipline appropriate to the presenting complaint. The physician’s examination may occur before or after the voice evaluation by the speech-language pathologist.” Speech-language pathologists “are not doing any medical diagnostic work with these procedures,” Dr. White said. “It’s all functional in nature.”

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Health Policy, Rhinology Tagged With: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), health policyIssue: September 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • Babbling Is Necessary for Speech and Language Development
  • Is Speech Language Pathologist Evaluation Necessary in the Non-Operative Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer?
  • The Role of Laryngoscopy and Videostroboscopy in Diagnosing Dysphonia
  • Listeners Could Readily Identify Speech Synthesized from Speech Neuroprosthetic Technology

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939