• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Staging System on Horizon for Head and Neck Cancers

by Thomas R. Collins • June 20, 2017

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) has announced a new edition of its staging manual for head and neck cancers. The revisions include sweeping changes in the classifications of some head and neck cancers and are scheduled to go into effect on January 1, 2018.

You Might Also Like

  • New Staging System Proposed for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • Panel Discusses Case Management of Head and Neck Cancers at 2016 TRIO Combined Sections Meeting
  • ‘Patient-Centered Approach’ Delivers High-Quality Care to Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • Sarcopenia Significantly Associated with Poorer Overall Survival of Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
Explore This Issue
June 2017

Dennis Kraus, MD, director of the Center for Head and Neck Oncology at the New York Head and Neck Institute in New York City, reviewed the update during a panel session at the Annual Meeting of the Triological Society. The changes are most dramatic in mucosal melanoma, oropharyngeal cancer, cancer with an unknown primary, and cancer of the oral cavity, he said.

The panel discussion also touched on robotic surgery and on the role of checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck cancer.

Changes to Cancer Staging

A main driver of the changes to the AJCC system was the goal to make staging a better tool for communicating with patients about their survival prospects, he said. “The concept is that we want to give any individual the actual likelihood of survival for their cancer,” he said. Those drafting the changes also wanted to refine the staging so that there would be a similar number of patients in each group, or roughly 25% in each of the four stages, he said.

Colored scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of squamous cell carcinoma cells from a human mouth.

Colored scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of squamous cell carcinoma cells from a human mouth.
© CNRI / Science Source

Another goal in making the changes is to distinguish each subgroup’s survival rates from those above and below it, he said. The changes also strive for worldwide acceptance and are meant to be applicable regardless of the resources of a center or provider, Dr. Kraus added.

Oropharyngeal cancer: Dr. Kraus said this is the category that has been updated the most. “One of the most notable changes—not just in the head and neck changes, but literally in this entire 600-page tome—are the changes that have been made in oropharyx cancer,” he said. Under the new system, only patients with metastatic disease will be considered stage IV. That’s because, when looking at three-year overall survival, stages I through III were grouped together fairly tightly, with “almost no statistical significance,” he said.

He added that, under the previous edition of the staging manual, the majority of patients were classified as having stage IV disease. “There’s poor balance, there’s poor hazard discrimination, and this was a must-fix for the current group,” he said. “We’ve made the obvious changes. We’ve separated oropharynx from hypopharynx. We have separate staging both for clinical and pathologic staging. And, interestingly, it’s very similar to nasopharynx disease, which has some overlap.”

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 | Single Page

Filed Under: Features Tagged With: cancer staging, cancer therapy, head and neck cancer, Triological Society annual meetingIssue: June 2017

You Might Also Like:

  • New Staging System Proposed for HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer
  • Panel Discusses Case Management of Head and Neck Cancers at 2016 TRIO Combined Sections Meeting
  • ‘Patient-Centered Approach’ Delivers High-Quality Care to Patients with Head and Neck Cancers
  • Sarcopenia Significantly Associated with Poorer Overall Survival of Patients with Head and Neck Cancers

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Have you invented or patented something that betters the field of otolaryngology?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Otolaryngologists as Entrepreneurs: Transforming Patient Care And Practice

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Continued Discussion And Engagement Are Essential To How Otolaryngologists Are Championing DEI Initiatives In Medicine

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Physician Handwriting: A Potentially Powerful Healing Tool
    • Leaky Pipes—Time to Focus on Our Foundations
    • You Are Among Friends: The Value Of Being In A Group
    • How To: Full Endoscopic Procedures of Total Parotidectomy
    • How To: Does Intralesional Steroid Injection Effectively Mitigate Vocal Fold Scarring in a Rabbit Model?

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939