• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

New Tool from the Joint Commission to Improve Surgical Consultations

by Susan Kreimer • March 6, 2012

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In mid-February, the Joint Commission introduced a new online tool meant to help combat inconsistencies in the surgical time out process.

You Might Also Like

  • Empathy Training as a Tool to Improve Medical Outcomes
  • What’s the Best Way to Improve Patient Safety?
  • Patient Safety Comes First in Clinical Decisions on Second Opinion Consultations
  • FDA Seeks to Prevent Surgical Fires
Explore This Issue
March 2012

To access the tool, health care providers must log in to the Targeted Solutions Tool (TST) website (jointcommissionconnect.org), where they can review a list of events that should occur before an incision is made. The aim is to prevent a cascade of errors that can begin before a patient is wheeled into the operating room.

Project Leader Melody Dickerson, RN, MSN, said the tool is meant to help organizations measure risk across their surgical system, including scheduling, pre-operative and operating room areas. The tool assists in monitoring surgical cases for weaknesses that could result in wrong-site surgeries, she said. “Most organizations are really proud of their OR on-time start records,” she said. “Yet most don’t have a policy in place to ensure that the necessary documentation is available when the patient arrives for surgery.”

Since the Joint Commission released its Universal Protocol regarding this issue in 2004, hospitals have made refinements to their time outs in order to reduce the incidence of wrong-site, wrong-procedure and wrong-person surgery.

Variation

Hospitals, ambulatory surgical centers and health systems are tailoring time outs to their specific needs, and otolaryngologists in various subspecialties must conform to these regulations.

“Most surgeons working in hospitals really don’t have a choice as to how they do time outs. It typically is an OR or hospital standard,” said Michael M. Johns III, MD, associate professor of otolaryngology at Emory University School of Medicine and director of the Emory Voice Center in Atlanta.

Surgical Safety Checklist

click for large version
Surgical Safety Checklist

In formulating these policies, however, hospital administrators do seek input from surgeons, anesthesiologists and nurses. While this sets a minimum standard, health providers can go above and beyond the basics to ensure safety.

“I think it’s important, as part of the time out, not to just review who the patient is, what the surgery is, what the planned procedure is, but also to make sure that all the critical equipment that’s needed for the case is functioning before you start,” Dr. Johns said.

Ideally, the dialogue should cover anticipated blood loss and other complications. “If you review those additional things beforehand,” he said, “then you’re less likely to have errors. It doesn’t take a lot of time to do this. It really is a one-minute-or-less procedure.”

Time outs are typically done with the surgeon and the circulating nurse confirming the patient’s name, side of the surgery, exact procedure and proper body positioning. The scrub nurse, scrub technician and anesthesiologist are also included. If they do not agree on all these pieces of information, the process is halted until resolution occurs.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Single Page

Filed Under: Departments, Health Policy Tagged With: outcomes, patient safety, policy, protocol, risk, surgery, technology, time outsIssue: March 2012

You Might Also Like:

  • Empathy Training as a Tool to Improve Medical Outcomes
  • What’s the Best Way to Improve Patient Safety?
  • Patient Safety Comes First in Clinical Decisions on Second Opinion Consultations
  • FDA Seeks to Prevent Surgical Fires

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939