• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Newborn Hearing Screening Affects Age Children Receive Cochlear Implantation

by Amy Hamaker • April 7, 2015

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What influence does the introduction of newborn hearing screening programs have on the age at which cochlear implantation occurs in children?

Background: Early cochlear implantation in children has a positive effect on the development of the auditory pathway and on post-operative outcomes, but delays in the severe hearing impairment detection or recognition could introduce undesired speech development and verbal communication skills retardation. The introduction of newborn hearing screening programs has allowed very early detection of hearing impairment, but the extent of this influence is unknown.

You Might Also Like

  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation
  • Preservation of Residual Hearing after Cochlear Implant Using SMA
  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • Tablet Game Found Comparable to Standard Hearing Screening for Children
Explore This Issue
April 2015

Study design: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study of 1,299 pediatric cochlear implant (CI) users who received their implants before age 5 between 1995 and 2011.

Setting: Hannover Medical School (MHH), Germany, and University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht, Netherlands.

Synopsis: The age at implantation decreased significantly between 1995 and 2011 at both centers (median age at UMC: 3.4 to 0.9 years; mean age at MHH: 3.1 to 1.9 years). The number of children receiving CIs before age 3.5 years increased at MHH from 67% (1995–1998) to 86% (2008–2011) and at UMC from 60% (1995–1998) to 96% (2008–2011). After introduction in the Netherlands in July 2006, there was a significant decline in the age at implantation, but there was no marked decline at MHH after program introduction in Germany in 2009. The percentage of children who received their implants before age 1 increased from 9% (2003–2006) to 37% (2007–2010) at UMC, and from 18% (2006–2008) to 24% (2009–2011) at MHH. A considerable delay between the first visit and surgery at UMC may suggest that reducing delays increases the likelihood that children will receive implants within their first year. Limitations include limited or missing data on the cause of deafness and insufficient data to evaluate the onset age of deafness, residual hearing, comorbidities, and the duration and effect of previous hearing aid trials.

Bottom line: The introduction of the national newborn hearing screening program has reduced the age at which young children receive CIs in the Netherlands but not in Germany. Correspondingly, the program resulted in an increase in the number of children implanted early in life.

Citation: Lammers MJW, Jansen, TTG, Grolman W, et al. The influence of newborn hearing screening on the age at cochlear implantation in children. Laryngoscope. 2015;125:985-990.

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology, Pediatric Tagged With: cochlear implant, pediatric, screeningIssue: April 2015

You Might Also Like:

  • Bilateral CI in Children Shows Few Benefits Over Unilateral Implantation
  • Preservation of Residual Hearing after Cochlear Implant Using SMA
  • Cochlear Implant Effective in Language Development if Implanted at Early Age
  • Tablet Game Found Comparable to Standard Hearing Screening for Children

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939