• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

NIH Support for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Research Grows, Diversifies: Part 1 of 2

by Maureen Hannley, PhD • September 1, 2007

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Some seasoned investigators have found, however, that competition for funding is tougher than ever before: More applications of significantly higher quality are being submitted, and the average grant budget is more than 60% higher today than it was 10 years ago (IMPAC database, www.NIH.gov ); so even though the NIH’s budget doubled between 1998 and 2003, its buying power did not increase proportionately. Since 2003, the NIH budget appropriation has plateaued at essentially the same level, while research costs continue to rise. Moreover, with representation of physician reviewers on study sections at its lowest point in almost 30 years, otolaryngologists are often not at the table to serve as advocates for their peers’ medically oriented research projects (Figure 3). Other investigators are choosing to relinquish their grants without attempting to renew them in the face of escalating demands for clinical productivity in their academic departments, or the desire to carve out a more balanced lifestyle with family, friends, and free time.

You Might Also Like

  • Institutional Support and Funding Opportunities for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Research: Part 2 of 2
  • Female Otolaryngologists Pursuing Research Careers Need More Support, Researchers Conclude
  • Study Findings Move Research Closer to Personalized Head and Neck Cancer Treatments
  • Triological Society and American College of Surgeons Grants Support Otolaryngology Careers
Explore This Issue
September 2007
Figure 3. Percentage of Physicians on NIH Study Sections

click for large version
Figure 3. Percentage of Physicians on NIH Study Sections
Maureen Hannley, PhD

Maureen Hannley, PhD

The longevity record among the currently active research project grants belongs to Triological Society member Joseph B. Nadol Jr., MD, of the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, for his project, Electron Microscopy of the Human Inner Ear, now in its 26th year of funding. His record is closely matched by Bruce Gantz, MD‘s cochlear implant program project grant (21 years), Richard Chole, MD, PhD‘s cholesteatoma project (19 years), and Dr. Richard T. Miyamoto, MD‘s two cochlear implant projects (16 and 18 years, respectively). An important national resource, the Yerkes National Primate Research Center, is supported by a specialized center grant now in its 46th year and is led by Michael M.E. Johns, MD, who was recently named Chancellor of Emory University.

Among the most durable of the grants are the institutional training grants (T32), the mainstay of research training for residents. Of the 13 institutional training grants led by otolaryngologists, 9 (69%) have been funded for 10 years or longer: University of Washington (24 years); University of Pittsburgh (21 years, 12 years); Washington University (20 years); Johns Hopkins University and Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary (18 years each); University of Iowa and Memorial Sloan-Kettering (14 years each); and M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (10 years).

©2007 The Triological Society

Pages: 1 2 3 | Single Page

Filed Under: Everyday Ethics, Head and Neck, Health Policy, Medical Education Issue: September 2007

You Might Also Like:

  • Institutional Support and Funding Opportunities for Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Research: Part 2 of 2
  • Female Otolaryngologists Pursuing Research Careers Need More Support, Researchers Conclude
  • Study Findings Move Research Closer to Personalized Head and Neck Cancer Treatments
  • Triological Society and American College of Surgeons Grants Support Otolaryngology Careers

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939