• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

No Evidence for Mucosal Migration Theory of Cholesteatoma Formation

by ENTtoday • October 14, 2018

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Study design: Comparative study of 73 human temporal bones.

You Might Also Like

  • Intraoperative Endoscope Use Reduces Cholesteatoma Recurrence, Cost
  • Can Radiologic Imaging Replace Second-Look Procedures for Cholesteatoma?
  • How To: Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Epitympanic Cholesteatoma with Obliteration Using Bioglass
  • Mastoid Obliteration Could Be Effective in Cholesteatoma Surgery, but More Data Are Needed
Explore This Issue
October 2018

Setting: Otopathology Laboratory in the Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.

Synopsis: The temporal bones were separated into five groups: 1. cholesteatoma; 2. chronic otitis media without cholesteatoma (COM); 3. retraction pockets (RPs); 4. cystic fibrosis (CF); and 5. a control group with no middle ear disease. In the epitympanum: There were no differences in the number or distribution of ciliated cells between the pars tensa and pars flaccida of the tympanic membrane among the groups. The mean number of ciliated cells at the lateral epitympanum’s mucosal lining and the malleus and incus’s lateral surface were significantly reduced in bones with cholesteatoma.

There were fewer ciliated cells in the RP group compared with non-diseased ears; when present, they were usually located at the lateral wall of the epitympanum, not on the ossicles. In the tympanic membrane: The mean number of ciliated cells was decreased in the cholesteatoma compared to RP groups. In the protympanum: Ciliated cells were plentiful for all four conditions studied.

The mean number of ciliated cells in the lateral wall of the protympanic space was decreased in the group with cholesteatoma and COM compared to RP, CF, and control groups. Some ciliated cells were found at the tympanic membrane’s anterior annulus and at the posterior portion of the handle of the malleus, in contact with the tympanic membrane. The epithelium covering the ossicles’ lateral face at the epitympanum and at the medial surface of the tympanic membrane consisted of flat simple squamous epithelium.

Citation: Pauna HF, Monsanto RC, Schachern P, et al. Evidence against the mucosal traction theory in cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:1663–1667.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Otology/Neurotology Tagged With: CholesteatomaIssue: October 2018

You Might Also Like:

  • Intraoperative Endoscope Use Reduces Cholesteatoma Recurrence, Cost
  • Can Radiologic Imaging Replace Second-Look Procedures for Cholesteatoma?
  • How To: Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Epitympanic Cholesteatoma with Obliteration Using Bioglass
  • Mastoid Obliteration Could Be Effective in Cholesteatoma Surgery, but More Data Are Needed

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Do you use AI-powered scribes for documentation?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • How to: Positioning for Middle Cranial Fossa Repair of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence

    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • The Importance of Time Away
    • Endoscopic Ear Surgery: Advancements and Adoption Challenges 
    • Reflections from a Past President of the Triological Society
    • ENT Surgeons Explore the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Powered Scribes: Revolutionizing Documentation in Healthcare
    • How To: Open Expansion Laryngoplasty for Combined Glottic and Subglottic Stenosis

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939