• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Office Space in Our Hybrid World

January 8, 2025

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Welcome to 2025! What will office space need to look like in 2030? 2035? Our hybrid world is most likely here to stay. What can be done to provide our staff with the optimal work environment that meets the needs of our patients and the work and life needs of our staff, and provide faculty with the needed administrative support to run successful practices and reduce “pajama time” and rework?

You Might Also Like

  • Hearing Impairment in Pediatric Population Associated with Higher Prevalence of Loneliness
  • How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Medical Conferences
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery
Explore This Issue
January 2025

A top priority is understanding and defining our administrative needs. Understanding which tasks can be done remotely and which require in-person work will facilitate the development of job descriptions that attract individuals who will be successful in their roles. Individuals need to feel that their effort in coming to work is justified, that their time and skill are valuable to the institution or practice, and that they have the needed space to perform their roles. Riding a train for two hours without having a dedicated workspace to perform tasks they could do effectively from home will not retain the highly talented staff we need to care for patients.

Additionally, we need to understand the needs of each staff member. Each individual has unique needs that enable them to work at their best. Depending on their commute time, along with the available office space at home and at the workplace, staff may prefer in-office, hybrid, or fully remote work arrangements.

Furthermore, whether in person or remote, we need to build highly functional, trusting teams. The 2024 Harvard Business Review article, “We’re Still Lonely at Work,” asserts that loneliness should not be used as a reason for everyone to be in person, as the authors found that loneliness is not caused by remote or in-person work but by dysfunctional teams. So, whether you and your staff are in person, remote, or hybrid, focusing on developing highly functioning teams will go a long way toward organizational success.

Lastly, office space is a symbol. A symbol of respect in the organization. Take a walk down the halls at your place of work. Who has a big office? A window? A shared office? No office? An office is also, of course, a place to get work done—write, see patients, make phone calls, compose emails, and have in-person and virtual meetings. How is office space assigned in your organization? What are the rules on hybrid versus remote work?

Life is about balance. Finding the sweet spot between in-person and hybrid work, understanding the types of office spaces needed, and determining how office space is assigned are critical for ensuring the future success of healthcare institutions and providing the highest quality of care to our patients.

Things to consider:

  • Define in-person versus remote tasks.
  • Improve technology to facilitate remote work.
  • Provide the office space needed to perform in-person work effectively.
  • Build highly functional, trusting teams to decrease loneliness regardless of whether the work is in person or remote.
  • Understand how office space functions as a symbol. Are you sending the right message? 

 —Robin

Filed Under: Departments, Letter From the Editor Tagged With: Hybrid work space, in-person versus remoteIssue: January 2025

You Might Also Like:

  • Hearing Impairment in Pediatric Population Associated with Higher Prevalence of Loneliness
  • How the COVID-19 Pandemic Changed Medical Conferences
  • In-Office Laryngeal Procedures in Awake Patients a Viable, and Often Preferable, Option
  • Innovation in Cochlear Impant Surgery

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939