• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Do Open and Endoscopic Resection Approaches to Juvenile Nasopharyngea Angiofibroma Result in Similar Blood Loss, Recurrence Rates?

by John P. Dahl MD, PhD, MBA, David A. Zopf MD, MS, and Sanjay R. Parikh MD • November 17, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

TRIO Best PracticeTRIO Best Practice articles are brief, structured reviews designed to provide the busy clinician with a handy outline and reference for day-to-day clinical decision making. The ENTtoday summaries below include the Background and Best Practice sections of the original article. To view the complete Laryngoscope articles free of charge, visit Laryngoscope.com.

You Might Also Like

  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • Surgical Resection of Pediatric Skull Base Tumors: Expanded Endonasal Approaches Compare Well with Traditional Transcranial Approaches
  • Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results
  • Is There a Role for Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Large Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibromas?
Explore This Issue
November 2016

Background

Juvenile nasopharyngeal angiofibromas (JNAs) are rare, slow-growing tumors of the nasal cavity and skull base that account for approximately 0.5% of all head and neck tumors. This benign, highly vascular tumor is almost exclusively found in adolescent males. JNAs classically present with nasal obstruction and/or recurrent epistaxis. More advanced tumors can present with facial asymmetry, facial swelling, and visual disturbances. Histologically, JNAs are nonencapsulated tumors comprised of an irregular network of blood vessels set in fibroblastic stroma. They are thought to originate from the sphenopalatine foramen and initially grow into the nasal cavity and pterygopalatine fossa. More advanced lesions are locally destructive and can extend into the infratemporal fossa, orbit, and middle cranial fossa. There are a number of staging systems for JNAs based on the size and extent of the tumor; however, there is no current consensus regarding the optimal classification. The treatment of JNAs is surgical excision, often in combination with preoperative angiography and embolization of the vessels supplying the tumor. JNAs were traditionally resected via open surgical approaches; however, with the advancement of endoscopic skull base techniques, an increasing number of these tumors are being removed endoscopically.

Best Practice

The question as to whether there is an optimal surgical approach for the resection of JNAs continues to be a source of controversy. There is a growing body of evidence supporting, at the very least, the equivalence of endoscopic and open surgical approaches in terms of tumor recurrence. It does appear that the endoscopic approach, either alone or in combination with preoperative embolization, has less intraoperative blood loss. The findings from the systematic reviews, though informative, highlight the need for prospective multi-institutional trials, which employ validated tumor staging systems and clinical outcome measures. Although great strides have been made regarding evidence-based management of JNAs, the extent and location of the tumor, combined with the surgeon’s judgment and skills, should ultimately determine the optimal approach for each patient (Laryngoscope. 2015;125:2436–2437).

Filed Under: Head and Neck, TRIO Best Practices Tagged With: head and neck, head and neck tumor, juvenile nasopharyngea angiofibroma, surgical approach, treatment, tumor, tumor recurrenceIssue: November 2016

You Might Also Like:

  • Endoscopic versus Open Craniofacial Resection of Esthesioneuroblastoma: What Is the Evidence?
  • Surgical Resection of Pediatric Skull Base Tumors: Expanded Endonasal Approaches Compare Well with Traditional Transcranial Approaches
  • Endoscopic Resection of Esthesioneuroblastomas Shows Promising Results
  • Is There a Role for Adjuvant Therapy in Patients with Large Juvenile Nasopharyngeal Angiofibromas?

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939