• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Technology
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
    • SUO Corner
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Oral Corticosteroid for Chronic Rhinosinusitis May Be Lower Risk Than Surgery

by Linda Kossoff • March 16, 2021

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

What is the threshold effectiveness for oral corticosteroid (OCS) use to avert endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) that would minimize OCS risk exposure in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS)?

BOTTOM LINE: The inclusion of OCS as part of appropriate medical therapy (AMT) for CRS may be the lower-risk strategy.

You Might Also Like

  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • No Inherent Increased COVID-19 Infection Risk in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Scant Data on Oral Corticosteroid Therapy for CRS Without Polyps
  • Secondhand Smoke Increases Chronic Rhinosinusitis Risk
Explore This Issue
March 2021

BACKGROUND: The rationale for prescribing OCS to patients with CRS is to avoid the greater risks of ESS; however, if OCS proves ineffective in preventing surgery, the patient is exposed to the risks of both. Therefore, determining the likelihood of OCS effectiveness in averting ESS is key to deciding whether it should be prescribed.

STUDY DESIGN: Probabilistic risk analysis.

SETTING: Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

SYNOPSIS: Researchers set out to identify the threshold effectiveness for OCS that would make the inclusion of OCS in AMT the lower-risk strategy—the minimum effectiveness required to avoid further intervention (MERAFI). Drawing on incidences and impacts of adverse events associated with OCS and ESS reported in literature, they constructed a risk model from which to conduct a probabilistic risk analysis. Monte Carlo analysis was performed to identify MERAFI for CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) and CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The MERAFI values were found to be 20.8% and 16.8% for CRSsNP and CRSwNP, respectively, indicating that if the probability of OCS preventing surgery exceeds these thresholds, then AMT with OCS becomes the lower-risk strategy. Authors noted that different age groups and patient-specific comorbidities may have different complication and adverse event probabilities, however, and the length of treatment and durability of symptom relief remain open questions. Study limitations were related to the source data and the validity of the model construction.

CITATION: Leung RM, Smith TL, Kern RC, et al. Should oral corticosteroids be used in medical therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis? A risk analysis [published online ahead of print July 7, 2020]. Laryngoscope. 

Filed Under: Literature Reviews, Rhinology, Rhinology Tagged With: clinical risk, rhinosinusitisIssue: March 2021

You Might Also Like:

  • Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Superior to Two of Three Biologics in Treating Severe Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
  • No Inherent Increased COVID-19 Infection Risk in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Scant Data on Oral Corticosteroid Therapy for CRS Without Polyps
  • Secondhand Smoke Increases Chronic Rhinosinusitis Risk

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

More and more medical trainees are taking dedicated, prolonged gap years. Did you?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Is the SLOR in Otolaryngology Residency Applications Contributing to Rural Disparities?
  • Applications Open for Resident Members of the ENTtoday Editorial Board
  • A Resident’s View of AI in Otolaryngology
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • Resident Pearls: Pediatric Otolaryngologists Share Tips for Safer, Smarter Tonsillectomies
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • Office Laryngoscopy Is Not Aerosol Generating When Evaluated by Optical Particle Sizer
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Empty Nose Syndrome: Physiological, Psychological, or Perhaps a Little of Both?
    • Top 10 LARY and LIO Articles of 2024
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?
    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?
    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment
    • Keeping Watch for Skin Cancers on the Head and Neck
    • Short-Term Efficacy of Biologics in Recalcitrant AFRS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • The Devaluation of Otolaryngology: An Evaluation of CMS’s Involvement in Physician Reimbursement
    • Embolized Middle Meningeal Artery as a Surgical Landmark in Infratemporal Fossa
    • Lord of the (Magnetic) Rings: Rigid Bronchoscopy for Aspirated Magnetic Foreign Bodies in Tertiary Bronchi
    • What Otolaryngologists Can Learn from Athletes

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2026 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939