• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Patients With Isolated Mandible Fractures Should Be Screened for Concussion

by Mary Beth Nierengarten • March 17, 2016

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

Patients who present with isolated mandible fractures may benefit from concussion screening, report investigators in a recently published study JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery.

You Might Also Like

  • Is Fixation of Mandible Fractures Urgent?
  • When Is Immediate Surgical Intervention Required for Isolated Orbital Blowout Fractures?
  • Erich Arch Bar Use Declines in Favor of Manual Reduction in Mandible Fracture Management
  • The Importance of Timing in Mandible Fracture Repair

The prospective study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that concussions after mandible fractures are more common than previously thought. The study included 16 patients with a mandible fracture seen within 24 hours of presenting to the emergency department of a level I trauma center between June 2013 and June 2014. Most of the patients were male (88%), and the mean age was 27.5 years.

The cause of fracture was due to assault in 12 (75%) patients, sports injury in 2 (13%), car crash in 1 (6%), and bike injury in 1 (6%). Alcohol use (but no illicit drug use) was reported in 50% of the patients.

To see which patients may be at high risk of developing a concussion, they were given the Military Acute Concussion Evaluation (MACE) test within 24 hours of their injury (mean 11.25 hours, range of 3-21 hours).

Based on MACE, 12 (75%) of patients met the criteria for concussion. Alcohol use at the time of injury was reported by 7 of these 12 (58%) patients.

“These findings of concussion are higher than anticipated,” said Robert M. Kellman, MD, professor and chair in the department of otolaryngology and communication sciences at SUNY Upstate Medical University in Syracuse, N.Y., an author of the study. As such, he emphasized that concussions should be considered in all patients with mandible fractures.

Filed Under: Facial Plastic/Reconstructive, Online Exclusives, Practice Focus Tagged With: concussion, mandible fracture

You Might Also Like:

  • Is Fixation of Mandible Fractures Urgent?
  • When Is Immediate Surgical Intervention Required for Isolated Orbital Blowout Fractures?
  • Erich Arch Bar Use Declines in Favor of Manual Reduction in Mandible Fracture Management
  • The Importance of Timing in Mandible Fracture Repair

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939