ENTtoday
  • Home
  • COVID-19
  • Practice Focus
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Departments
    • Issue Archive
    • TRIO Best Practices
      • Allergy
      • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
      • Head and Neck
      • Laryngology
      • Otology/Neurotology
      • Pediatric
      • Rhinology
      • Sleep Medicine
    • Career Development
    • Case of the Month
    • Everyday Ethics
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Medical Education
    • Online Exclusives
    • Practice Management
    • Resident Focus
    • Rx: Wellness
    • Special Reports
    • Tech Talk
    • Viewpoint
    • What’s Your O.R. Playlist?
  • Literature Reviews
    • Allergy
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Events
    • Featured Events
    • TRIO Meetings
  • Contact Us
    • About Us
    • Editorial Board
    • Triological Society
    • Advertising Staff
    • Subscribe
  • Advertise
    • Place an Ad
    • Classifieds
    • Rate Card
  • Search

Patients More Likely to Survive Complex Cancer Surgery at Top Hospitals than Affiliates

by Amy E. Hamaker • August 12, 2019

  • Tweet
  • Email
Print-Friendly Version

You Might Also Like

  • Post-Discharge Care Fragmentation Leads to Increased Risks for Patients with HN Cancer
  • Link Between Mortality and Post-Surgery Complications Unclear
  • Depression Affects Two-Year Survival Rates in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer
Explore This Issue
August 2019

Comment: While head and neck surgeries were not included, this manuscript addresses one method by which hospitals seek to improve their branding and overall profile in the community: acquiring an affiliation (and thus, brand recognition) with a prominent institution or network. Fifty-nine hospitals achieved a top cancer hospital ranking and were affiliated with 343 additional hospitals. In prior survey studies, 31% of respondents thought that once a local hospital formed an affiliation with top-ranked cancer hospitals, it was no longer necessary to travel to top-ranked hospitals to undergo complex surgery and perceived the safety/outcomes to be identical (50% of respondents). This paper shows that the latter is not the case (eFigures 2–5 are striking).

I think this has interesting implications for: 1) criteria for establishing these affiliations (it’s not easy to access this information; do you just fork over money? Show adequate training and outcomes?) and ensuring high quality (or appropriate referrals for complex care); 2) larger institutions such as academic centers that acquire other hospitals or other affiliated facilities and need to protect their reputation in their home communities; and 3) how health systems may try to leverage affiliations and other branding to attract patients—and the ethical implications.—Jennifer A. Villwock, MD

Is there a difference in risk-adjusted perioperative mortality after complex cancer surgery between top-ranked cancer hospitals and affiliates that share their brand?

Bottom Line
The likelihood of surviving complex cancer surgery appears to be greater at top-ranked cancer hospitals compared with the affiliated hospitals that share their brand.

Background: Complex surgery can represent both the best chance of cure and the greatest potential for treatment-associated harm. Recently, leading cancer hospitals have increasingly shared their brands with smaller hospitals through affiliations. Previous studies have identified a wide variation in complex surgical procedure safety for cancer across hospitals, with lethal complications occurring up to four times more often at low-volume or underperforming hospitals.

Study design: Cross-sectional study of 29,228 Medicare beneficiaries older than 65 years of age who underwent complex cancer surgery (lobectomy, esophagectomy, gastrectomy, colectomy, and pancreaticoduodenectomy [Whipple procedure]) between Jan. 1, 2013, and Oct. 1, 2016, at top-ranked cancer hospitals (11,928 patients) and affiliated hospitals that share their brand (11,928 patients).

Setting: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 100% Medicare Provider Analysis and Review file.

Synopsis: Ninety-day mortality was the primary outcome. Fifty-nine hospitals achieved a top cancer hospital ranking during the study period and were affiliated with 343 additional hospitals. The affiliate patient population was older than the top-ranked hospital population, but otherwise clinically similar. Observed 90-day mortality was significantly higher among affiliated hospital patients than top-ranked hospital patients for each procedure. Risk-adjusted 90-day mortality was significantly higher at affiliated hospitals than at top-ranked hospitals for all five procedures combined. The affiliated patients’ higher mortality risk of ranged in magnitude when stratified by procedure (colectomy odds ratio of 1.32 to gastrectomy odds ratio of 2.04). In an attempt to explain the differential 90-day mortality risk observed among the top-ranked cancer hospitals and affiliates, several hospital attributes were individually added to the adjusted hierarchical regression model. Although no single hospital attribute eliminated the differential, annual hospital volume and teaching status both attenuated the differential’s magnitude and significance. Limitations included observations that may not generalize to all scenarios in which hospitals share their brand, a focus on patients older than 65 years, and unavailable clinical and sociodemographic characteristics.

Citation: Hoag JR, Resio BJ, Monsalve AF, et al. Differential safety between top-ranked cancer hospitals and their affiliates for complex cancer surgery. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2:e191912.

Pages: 1 2 | Single Page

Filed Under: Head and Neck, Literature Reviews Tagged With: cancer surgery, clinical outcome, head and neck cancerIssue: August 2019

You Might Also Like:

  • Post-Discharge Care Fragmentation Leads to Increased Risks for Patients with HN Cancer
  • Link Between Mortality and Post-Surgery Complications Unclear
  • Depression Affects Two-Year Survival Rates in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
  • High-Volume Hospitals, Surgeons Better Predictors of Overall Survival in Head, Neck Cancer

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

The Laryngoscope
Ensure you have all the latest research at your fingertips; Subscribe to The Laryngoscope today!

Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
Open access journal in otolaryngology – head and neck surgery is currently accepting submissions.

Classifieds

View the classified ads »

TRIO Best Practices

View the TRIO Best Practices »

Top Articles for Residents

  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Why More MDs, Medical Residents Are Choosing to Pursue Additional Academic Degrees
  • What Physicians Need to Know about Investing Before Hiring a Financial Advisor
  • Tips to Help You Regain Your Sense of Self
  • Should USMLE Step 1 Change from Numeric Score to Pass/Fail?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • Experts Delve into Treatment Options for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Weaning Patients Off of PPIs
    • Vertigo in the Elderly: What Does It Mean?
    • New Developments in the Management of Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
    • Some Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Resists PPI Treatment
    • Eustachian Tuboplasty: A Potential New Option for Chronic Tube Dysfunction and Patulous Disease
    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment
    • Podcasts Becoming More Popular Method of Education for Otolaryngologists
    • How to Embrace Optimism in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    • Tips on How to Approach Conversations with Patients about the COVID-19 Vaccine
    • Steps You Should Take to Protect Your Voice and Hearing During Telemedicine Sessions
    • Routine Postoperative Adjunct Treatments Unnecessary for Idiopathic Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Polls

Have you spoken with your patients about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive
  • Home
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use

Visit: The Triological Society • The Laryngoscope • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology

Wiley
© 2021 The Triological Society. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN 1559-4939

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
This site uses cookies: Find out more.