• Home
  • Practice Focus
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
    • How I Do It
    • TRIO Best Practices
  • Business of Medicine
    • Health Policy
    • Legal Matters
    • Practice Management
    • Tech Talk
    • AI
  • Literature Reviews
    • Facial Plastic/Reconstructive
    • Head and Neck
    • Laryngology
    • Otology/Neurotology
    • Pediatric
    • Rhinology
    • Sleep Medicine
  • Career
    • Medical Education
    • Professional Development
    • Resident Focus
  • ENT Perspectives
    • ENT Expressions
    • Everyday Ethics
    • From TRIO
    • The Great Debate
    • Letter From the Editor
    • Rx: Wellness
    • The Voice
    • Viewpoint
  • TRIO Resources
    • Triological Society
    • The Laryngoscope
    • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
    • TRIO Combined Sections Meetings
    • COSM
    • Related Otolaryngology Events
  • Search

Patients Respond to Oral BRAF Inhibitor

by Dennis H. Kraus, MD, and Luc Morris, MD • April 4, 2011

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
Print-Friendly Version

In patients with stage IV melanoma with distant metastases, what is the response rate to an oral inhibitor of the protein kinase BRAF?

You Might Also Like

  • First Two Patients Respond to Gene Therapy in Melanoma Study
  • Elective Neck Dissection Does Not Improve Survival Rate but May Have Prognostic Role in Oral Cavity Mucosal Melanoma
  • Survival Rates Comparable in Children and Adults with Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Cancer
  • Younger Patients with Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Have Better Survival Rates
Explore This Issue
April 2011

Background: There are few effective therapies for patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma. Response rates to standard therapy (interleukin-2 or dacarbazine) are 10 to 20 percent, and complete responses are exceedingly rare. The activating V600E mutation in the BRAF gene is found in 40 to 60 percent of melanomas. The oral agent PLX4032 is a potent inhibitor of mutated BRAF signaling.

Study design: Phase I dose-escalation trial followed by extension phase. The dose-escalation phase included 55 patients. The recommended phase II dose was then administered to 32 patients with metastatic melanoma testing positive for the V600E mutation in the BRAF gene.

Setting: Multi-center trial.

Synopsis: An oral dose of 960 mg twice daily was selected as the recommended phase II dose. The most common toxicities were rash, arthralgia, nausea, photosensitivity, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and pruritus, 89 percent of which were grade 1-2. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas developed in 31 percent of patients; these were resected and did not lead to treatment discontinuation.

Response rate in the extension cohort of V600E mutant melanomas was 26 of 32 patients (81 percent). Dramatic tumor responses were observed in the lungs, lymph nodes, visceral organs and bone metastases. The median progression-free survival was greater than seven months, and median overall survival had not been reached at the time of data analysis.

Bottom line: An unprecedented 81 percent response rate was observed in patients with metastatic melanoma carrying a mutated, activated BRAF gene and treated with an oral BRAF inhibitor. This mutation is found in 40 to 60 percent of melanomas, a similar percentage of papillary and anaplastic thyroid cancers and a smaller percentage of other cancers. A phase III trial is currently underway to determine whether PLX4032 improves overall survival.

Citation: Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, et al. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(9):809-819.

—Reviewed by Dennis H. Kraus, MD, and Luc Morris, MD

Filed Under: Clinical, Laryngology, Literature Reviews Tagged With: BRAF, clinical, Oral BRAF Inhibitor, patient response, response rate, stage IV melanomaIssue: April 2011

You Might Also Like:

  • First Two Patients Respond to Gene Therapy in Melanoma Study
  • Elective Neck Dissection Does Not Improve Survival Rate but May Have Prognostic Role in Oral Cavity Mucosal Melanoma
  • Survival Rates Comparable in Children and Adults with Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Cancer
  • Younger Patients with Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Have Better Survival Rates

The Triological SocietyENTtoday is a publication of The Triological Society.

Polls

Would you choose a concierge physician as your PCP?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...
  • Polls Archive

Top Articles for Residents

  • Applications Open for Resident Members of ENTtoday Edit Board
  • How To Provide Helpful Feedback To Residents
  • Call for Resident Bowl Questions
  • New Standardized Otolaryngology Curriculum Launching July 1 Should Be Valuable Resource For Physicians Around The World
  • Do Training Programs Give Otolaryngology Residents the Necessary Tools to Do Productive Research?
  • Popular this Week
  • Most Popular
  • Most Recent
    • A Journey Through Pay Inequity: A Physician’s Firsthand Account

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • The Dramatic Rise in Tongue Tie and Lip Tie Treatment

    • Rating Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Severity: How Do Two Common Instruments Compare?

    • Is Middle Ear Pressure Affected by Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Use?

    • Otolaryngologists Are Still Debating the Effectiveness of Tongue Tie Treatment

    • Complications for When Physicians Change a Maiden Name

    • Excitement Around Gene Therapy for Hearing Restoration
    • “Small” Acts of Kindness
    • How To: Endoscopic Total Maxillectomy Without Facial Skin Incision
    • Science Communities Must Speak Out When Policies Threaten Health and Safety
    • Observation Most Cost-Effective in Addressing AECRS in Absence of Bacterial Infection

Follow Us

  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • The Triological Society
  • The Laryngoscope
  • Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Cookies

Wiley

Copyright © 2025 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved, including rights for text and data mining and training of artificial technologies or similar technologies. ISSN 1559-4939